期刊文献+

非人行动者的能动性质疑——反思拉图尔的行动者能动性观念 被引量:13

Questioning the Agency of Nonhumans:Reflection on Latour's Idea of the Agency of the Actors
原文传递
导出
摘要 拉图尔在行动者网络理论中提出的行动者能动性观念认为非人元素与人类一样,都作为科学行动者而享有完全对称的能动性,这种认可非人作为行动者也具有能动性的观点备受争议。拉图尔之所以赋予非人以能动性,一是为了在行动者网络理论中继续体现他对科学的历时性特征的理解,二是为了实现科学研究的"人的祛中心化"。从行动者网络理论的结构主义符号学渊源来看,非人行动者的能动性观念存在先天性的不足之处。 Latour puts forward the idea of the actors' agency in ANT and thinks that nonhumans, as well as humans, sharecomplete symmetrical agency. By suggesting such a controversial idea, Latour wants firstly to show his understanding of thediachronic characteristics of science and secondly to realize the decentralization of humans in science studies. Judging from thesource of structuralist semiotics of ANT, the idea of nonhumans' agency has inherent disadvantages.
作者 贺建芹
出处 《自然辩证法通讯》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第3期78-82,127,共5页 Journal of Dialectics of Nature
关键词 非人 行动者 能动性 结构主义符号学 Nonhumans Actor Agency Structuralist semiotics
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Weber, M.. Economy and Society[ M] , Vol. 1. G. Roth and C. Witfich. Berkeley (eds.) . University of California Press, 1978, 22.
  • 2Latour, B.. On Recalling ANT[A3, in Law, J. and Hassard, J. (eds.), Actor Network Theory and Afier[C]. Oxford. Blackwell, 1999, 15 - 25.
  • 3Iatour, B.. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory[M]. Oxford. Oxford University Press, 2005, 46-55.
  • 4Latour, B.. Politics of Nature. How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy[M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts. Harvard University Press, 2004, 237.
  • 5B.拉图尔,张敦敏(译).答复D.布鲁尔的《反拉图尔论》[J].世界哲学,2008(4):71-81. 被引量:13
  • 6安德鲁·皮克林.实践的冲撞-时间、力量与科学[M].邢冬梅译.南京:南京大学出版社,2004.226,249(注[18]),21,9-10,22-23,226,6.
  • 7Greimas, A. J., Court,s , J. (eds.). Sem/ot/cs and/anguage. An Ana/yt/ca/D/ct/onary[ M]. Bloomington. Indiana University Press, 1982.
  • 8Greimas, A. J.. Maupassant. the Semiotics of Tect. Practical Exercises[ M]. New York. Johun Benjamins Publishing Company, 1988.
  • 9J.佩尔茨,朱志方.论“符号学”概念[J].湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1993,20(6):41-48. 被引量:3
  • 10Collins, H. M., Yearly, S.. Epistemological Chicken[ ], In A. Picketing (ed.). Sc/ence as Pract/ce and Cu/ture[ C]. Chicago. Uni- versity of Chicago Press, 1992, 301 - 326.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Bloor,D.Sociologie de la logique ou leslimites de lépistémologie[]..1982
  • 2Bloor,D.Knowledge and Social Imagery[]..1991
  • 3Callon,M,and Bruno,L.La Science tellequ elle se fait.Anthologie de la sociologie des sciencesde langue anglaise[]..1982
  • 4Callon,M,and Latour,B.Les Scien-tifiques et leurs alliés[]..1985
  • 5.Na-ture and Society.Anthropological Perspectives[]..1996
  • 6De Vries,G."Should we send Collins andLatour to Dayton Ohio-"[].EASSTReview.1995
  • 7Goodwin,C."Seeing in depth"[].SocialStudies ofScience.1995
  • 8Haraway,D.J.Simians,Cyborgs,and Women:The Reinvention ofNature[]..1991
  • 9Kant,E,trans.Norman Kemp Smith.Critique ofPure Reason[]..1950
  • 10Latour,B.We Have Never Been Modern[]..1993

共引文献23

同被引文献185

引证文献13

二级引证文献103

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部