期刊文献+

脊髓独立性评定量表Ⅲ中文版的适用性研究 被引量:32

The validity and reliability of Chinese version of spinal cord independence measureⅢ
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价脊髓独立性评定(SCIM)量表Ⅲ中文版的适用性。方法:利用功能独立性评定量表(FIM)和SCIMⅢ中文版对79例急性和27例慢性脊髓损伤患者的功能能力进行评定,通过内部一致信度、重测信度和评定者间信度评价SCIMⅢ中文版的信度,通过效标效度和结构效度评价SCIMⅢ中文版的效度。结果:①中文版SCIMⅢCronbachα系数为0.816,重测相关系数为0.9,总量表评定者间相关系数为0.92;②SCIMⅢ中文版各维度与FIM相对应维度相关系数均在0.806—0.845;SCIMⅢ中文版各维度间相关系数在0.56—0.714,各维度与总量表相关系数在0.732—0.848(P<0.01)。结论:SCIMⅢ中文版具有良好的信度、效度及可行性,适于中国脊髓损伤患者的功能结局评定;但是,呼吸和一些具体活动项目的记分结构或记分标准需要调整以进一步提高其信度、效度和临床应用。 Objective: To assess the validity and rehability of Chinese version of spinal cord independence measure Ⅲ (C-SCIM Ⅲ) in measuring functional ability in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). Method: Functional ability was measured with C-SCIM m and functional independence measure (FIM) in 79 patients with acute SCI and 27 patients with chronic SCI. FIM was used as a comparison standard for C-SCIM m. The intra-consistency reliability, intraclass reliability, inter-rater reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity were analyzed to test validity and reliability of C-SCIM m. Result: (1)The Cronbach's c~ coefficient of C-SCIM m was 0.816. The intraclass correlation coefficient were above 0.92. The coefficient of Pearson correlation between the paired raters was 0.90. (2)The coefficient of Pearson correlation between-FIM and C-SCIM Ⅲ were 0.806--0.845 in four subgroups. The coefficient of Pearson correlation between four subgroups and the total scale of C-SCIM m were 0.732----0.848, and between four sub- groups each other were 0.56---0.714. Conclusion: C-SCIM Ⅲ is a reliable and valid measure for functional ability in SCI. However, a few modifica- tions of scoring categories in breathe and detailed scoring instructions may further improve the validity, reliability and clinical utility of SCIM Ⅲ .
出处 《中国康复医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第6期529-532,共4页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
基金 首都医学发展基金重点支持项目(2007-2023)
关键词 脊髓独立性评定量表Ⅲ中文版 脊髓损伤 功能能力 信度 效度 Chinese version of spinal cord independence measure spinal cord injury functional ability reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Catz A, hzkovich M, Agranov E, et ah SCIM-spinal cord in- dependence measure: a new disability scale for patients with spinal cord lesions[J].Spinal Cord,1997,35:850f856.
  • 2Ca/z A, Itzkovich M, Agranov E, et al. The spinal cord inde- pendence measure (SCIM): sensitivity to functional changes in subgroups of spinal cord lesion patients[J].Spinal Cord,2001,39 (2):97-100.
  • 3Itzkovich M, Tripolski M, Zeilig G, eta|. Rasch analysis of the Catz-Itzkovich spinal cord independence measure[J].Spinal Cord,2002,40(8):395-407.
  • 4Itzkovich M, Tatnir A, Philo O,et al. Reliability of the Catz-hzkovich Spinal Cord Independence Measure assessment by interview and comparison with observation[J].Am J Phys Med Rehabil,2003,82(4):267-272.
  • 5Ronen J, ItzkovichM, Bluvshtein V,et al. Length of stay in hospital following spinal cord lesions in Israel[J].Spinal Cord,.2004,42(6):353-358.
  • 6Catz A, Itzkovich M, Steinberg F, et al. The Catz-hzkovich SCIM: a revised version of Spinal Cord Independence Measure [J].Disabil rehabil,2001,23(6):263-268.
  • 7Catz A, hzkovich M, Tesio L, et al. A multi-center inlerna- tional study on the spinal cord independence measure, ver- sion m: Rasch psychometric validation[J].Spinal Cord,2007,45: 275-291.
  • 8Anderson KD, Acuff ME, Arp BG, et al. United States (US) multi-center study to assess the validity and reliability of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM 111) [J].Spi- nal Cord,2011,49:850-885.
  • 9王于领,梁崎,黄东锋,陈少贞,江沁,杨飞,陈正宏.脊髓独立测量量表Ⅱ中文版的开发及信度和效度研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2007,22(8):714-717. 被引量:12
  • 10叶超群,孙天胜,李建军,周红俊,胥少汀.脊髓独立性评定及其第3版介绍[J].中国康复理论与实践,2007,13(10):921-923. 被引量:22

二级参考文献43

  • 1高霞,王茂斌.介绍FIM──一种残疾程度评测方法[J].中国康复医学杂志,1995,10(3):142-143. 被引量:41
  • 2许红璐,黄东锋,王于领,尤黎明,颜君.髋部骨折术后出院患者FIM评价及影响因素分析[J].中国康复医学杂志,2006,21(10):919-921. 被引量:8
  • 3无,李建军(译),周红俊(译),孙迎春(译),张新(译),王方永(译),高峰(译),周天健(译).脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准(第6版,2006)[J].中国康复理论与实践,2007,13(1):1-6. 被引量:112
  • 4Aids to Investigation of Peripheral Nerve Injuries. Medical Research Council War Memorandum, 2nd ed., Revised. London, HMSO, 1943.
  • 5Austin, G. M. : The Spinal Cord: Basic Aspects and Surgical Considerations. 2nd ed. , p. 762, Springfield, IL: Thomas, 1972.
  • 6Bracken, M. B, , Shepard, M. J. , Cllins, W. F. , Holford, T. R.,et al, : W randomized controlled trial of methylprednisolone or Naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury. N Engl J Med 1990,332:1405-1411.
  • 7Brunnstrom, F. , Dennen, M. : Round table on muscle testing. Annual Conference of American Physical Teherapy Association, Federation of Crippled and Disabled, Inc. , New Youd 1931 : 1-- 12.
  • 8Daniels. L., Worthingham, C.:Muscle Testing:Techniques of Manual Examination. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1972.
  • 9Frankel, H, L. , Hancock, D. O. , Hyslop, G. , et al. : The value of psotural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegea. Paralegia 1969 ; 7 (3) : 179-192.
  • 10Lovett, R.W.: The Treatment of Infantile Pralysis. 2nd. , p. 136.Philadelphia: P. Blakistion's Son, 1917.

共引文献180

同被引文献305

引证文献32

二级引证文献138

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部