期刊文献+

上市公司环境绩效与财务绩效的相关性研究 被引量:170

Research on Relationship Between Environmental Performance and Financial Performance of Chinese Listed Companies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 回顾了国内外关于环境绩效与财务绩效相关性的理论及实证研究成果,在此基础上提出以单位排污费及其年度增量分别作为环境绩效的代理变量,以Tobin-Q值作为财务绩效的代理变量,以我国A股上市公司2006-2009年的年报数据为样本,综合考虑公司规模、资产负债率等多种控制变量,采用格兰杰(Granger)检验和OLS回归分析等方法研究了我国企业环境绩效对财务绩效的相关性。研究表明,单纯的环境末端治理行为并不一定带来财务绩效的改善,由此引起的环境绩效与财务绩效之间的相关性也不明确。但积极有效的环境预防管理则可带来环境和财务绩效的共赢,环境绩效与财务绩效表现出显著的正相关关系。并且,环境绩效对财务绩效可能出现边际效用递减现象。研究结论说明,在我国当前环境信息披露严重缺乏的情况下,财务报表中的排污费不啻为研究环境绩效与财务绩效相关性的一个良好切入点。结论有助于鼓励上市公司积极主动地开展环境预防管理,从而保持和提升公司的竞争力优势。 After reviewing the worldwide studies on the relationship between the environmental performance and financial performance, the pollution charge and its annual increment are recommended for the first time as the proxy variables for the environmental performance of an enterprise, and an empirical examination of the relationship between environmental performance and financial performance as represented by the Tobin-Q value is performed. The methodological approach of this study mainly includes descriptive statistics, Granger causality test and OLS regression analysis. The sample data are collected from the annual reports of the A-share listed companies between 2006 and 2009, and various control variables such as corporation size are considered during the regression analysis. The study shows that, the just end-of-pipe pollution control approach does not necessarily improve the financial performance, indicating uncertain relativity between the environmental performance and financial performance. However, proactive pollution prevention management should be benefitial to both environmental and financial performance, leading to significant positive relationship between the two. Furthermore, the effect of environmental performance on financial performance may be subject to the law of diminishing marginal utility. It also indicates that the pollution charge should be a good starting point for the study of the relationship between environmental performance and financial performance particularly in the situation of lack of environmental information disclosure. Our resuhs are useful to the managers in that they show that active environmental prevention management can help improve the company's competitive advantage.
作者 胡曲应
出处 《中国人口·资源与环境》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期23-32,共10页 China Population,Resources and Environment
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"基于循环经济理念的社会责任会计体系创新研究"(编号:70872110) 中南民族大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目"上市公司环境绩效评价研究"(编号:CSQ11038)
关键词 财务绩效 环境绩效 相关性 排污费 financial performance environmental performance relationship pollution charge
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1Hart S, Ahuja G. Does It Pay to be Green? An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Emission Reduction and Finn Performance [ J ]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1996, 5:30 -37.
  • 2Schaltegger S, Synnestvedt T. The Link between 'Green' and Economic Success:Environmental Management as the Crucial Trigger between Environmental and Economic Performance [ J ]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2002, (65) :339 - 346.
  • 3Orlitzky M, Schmidt F L, Rynes S L. Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-analysis [ J ]. Organization Studies, 2003,24 (3) :403 -441.
  • 4Vogel D J. Is There a Market for Virtue? The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility [ J ]. California Management Review, 2005, 47(4) : 19 -45.
  • 5Zhang R, David S. Firms ' Environmental and Financial Performance: An Empirical Study [ EB/OL ]. CSR paper 19. 2007 [ 2010 - 09 - 25 ]. http ://ssrn. com/abstract = 1429886.
  • 6Peloza J. The Challenge of Measuring Financial Impacts from Investments in Corporate Social Performance [ J ]. Journal of Management, 2009, 35 (6) :1518 - 1541.
  • 7Jaggi B, Freedman M. An Examination of the Impact of Pollution Performance on Economic and Market Performance: Pulp and Paper Firms[ J]. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 1992, 19 (5) :697 -713.
  • 8Klassen R, Whybark D. The Impact of Environmental Technologies on Manufacturing Performance [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 1999,42 (6): 599-615.
  • 9Konar S, Mark A. Cohen. Does the Market Value Environmental Performance? I J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2001, 83(2) :281 -289.
  • 10Sarkis J, Cordeiro J Efficiencies and Technologies Versus An Empirical Evaluation of Environmental Firm Performance : Pollution Prevention End-of-pipe Practice [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001. , 135 : 102 - 113.

二级参考文献72

  • 1王立彦,李伟.环境管理体系认证审核的成本效益——对企业实施国际标准ISO14000s的调研[J].山西财经大学学报,2004,26(4):1-6. 被引量:9
  • 2肖淑芳,胡伟.我国企业环境信息披露体系的建设[J].会计研究,2005(3):47-52. 被引量:162
  • 3周一虹,孙小雁.中国上市公司环境信息披露的实证分析——以2004年沪市A股827家上市公司为例[J].南京审计学院学报,2006,3(4):22-25. 被引量:34
  • 4[1]Walley N,Whitehead B.It's not easy being green[J].Harvard Business Review,May-June 1994:46-52.
  • 5[2]Albrecht J.Environmental costs and competitiveness[EB/OL].a product-specific test of the Poter hypothesis,working paper at Http://www.ssrn.com[30 September 2001].
  • 6[4]Wagner M.A Review of empirical studies concerning the relationship between environmental and economic performance[A].What Does the Evidence Tell Us[C]? Center for Sustainability Management (CSM):Luneburg.
  • 7[6]Wagner M.The relationship between environmental and economic performance of firms,paper to the 2nd POSTI Meeting in collaboration with the ESST Annual Scientific conference [A],Strasbourg.2000.http://www.esst.uio.no/posti/workshops/wagner.html[25 September 2001].
  • 8[7]Tyteca D.Sustainability indicators at the firm level-pollution and regulation as industry policy[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and management,1999,30:282-300.
  • 9[9]Greene W H.Eecnometric Analysis[R].4th ed,Prentice-Hall:London,2000.
  • 10[10]Hart S L,Ahuja G.Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance[J].Business Strategy and the Environment,1996,5:30-37.

共引文献311

同被引文献1777

引证文献170

二级引证文献1999

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部