期刊文献+

地方政府干预、控制权接管与特别处理制度实施效果 被引量:3

Study on the Implementation Effect of Local Governance Intervene,Market for Corporate Control Special Treatment
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过对特别处理制度实施的实际效果及影响因素进行研究,发现特别处理制度可以通过两条途径发挥治理作用:一是对大股东的治理,即接管ST公司的控制权;二是对高管的治理,即变更高管或对现任高管施加压力。在这两条途径中,接管控制权是特别处理制度发挥治理作用的主要途径,而地方政府干预显著降低了公司被接管的可能性。 The paper focuses on the implementation effect of special treatment in China. The paper identifies two ways that the special treatment can improve the quality of the listed firms. One is takeover threats to the controlling shareholder, and the other is turnover threats to the incumbent managers. Theoretical analysis projects that the dominate way that special treatment can improve the quality of the listed firms is takeover threats to the controlling shareholder rather than turnover threats to the managers. Local govern- ment intervention weakens the positive effect of special treatment since local government intervention reduces the odds of ST finns be- ing acquired.
作者 朱滔
出处 《山西财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期1-8,共8页 Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目(项目编号:71102041) 广东省哲学社会科学“十一五”规划项目(项目编号:GD10YYJ10) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(项目编号:11JYB2016)
关键词 特别处理 接管 政府干预 控制权市场 special treatment takeover government intervene market for corporate control
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Bai C,Liu Q,Song F M.Bad News Is Good News [R]. Propping and Tunneling Evidence from China,Working Paper, 2004.
  • 2Barber B M,Lyon J D.Detecting Abnormal Operating Performance:The Empirical Power and Specification of Test Statis- tics [ J l.Journal of Financial Economics, 1996,41 (3):359-399.
  • 3Cheng P,Aerts W,Jorissen A.Earnings Management,Asset Restructuring, and the Threat of Exchange Delisting in an Earn- ings-Based Regulatory Regime [J ].Corporate Governance:An In- ternational Review,2010,18(5):438-456.
  • 4Ding Y,Zhang H,Zhang J.Private vs. State Ownership and Earnings Management:Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies [J].Corporate Governance:An International Review,2007,15 (2): 223-238.
  • 5Green W,Czernkowski R,Wang Y.Special Treatment Regulation in China:Potential Unintended Consequence [J ].Asian Review of Accounting,2009,17(3): 198-211.
  • 6Jian M,Wong T J.Propping through Related Party Trans- actions [ J ].Review of Accounting Studies,2010,15 (1):70-105.
  • 7Manne H.Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control [J ].Journal of Political Economy, 1965, 73(2): 110-120.
  • 8Shleifer A,Vishny R.A Survey of Corporate Governance [ J ].Journal of Finance, 1997,52(2):737-783.
  • 9Yang Y.Earnings Management as a Response to the Threat of Exchange Delisting[ R ].Working Paper,2006.
  • 10樊纲,王小鲁.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程报告[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2007.

二级参考文献54

共引文献143

同被引文献39

  • 1蒋洪强,徐玖平.环境成本核算研究的进展[J].生态环境,2004,13(3):429-433. 被引量:22
  • 2朱红军,陈继云,喻立勇.中央政府、地方政府和国有企业利益分歧下的多重博弈与管制失效——宇通客车管理层收购案例研究[J].管理世界,2006,22(4):115-129. 被引量:51
  • 3庄子银.创新、企业家活动配置与长期经济增长[J].经济研究,2007,42(8):82-94. 被引量:129
  • 4Romer,P. Endogenous Technological Change[ J]. Journal of Political economy, 1990,98(5) :71 - 102.
  • 5Nadiri, M. I. "Innovations and Technological Spillovers: National Bureau of Economic Research” . WorkingPaper, 1993.
  • 6Cropper, M. L.,Oates, W. E. “Environmental Economics; a Survey”. Journal of Economic Literature[J],1992,30(2) ; 675 -740.
  • 7Patel,P. , Pavitt,K. “National Innovation Systems: Why They Are Important, and How They Might beMeasured and Compared”. Economics of Innovation and New Technology [J]. 1994, 3(1), 77 - 95.
  • 8Leyden, D. P.,Link, A. N_ “Why are Governmental R&D and Private R&D Complements? Applied E-conomics[J] , 1991, 23(10) : 1673 -1681.
  • 9Hewitt - Dundas,N.,Roper. , S. “Output Additionality of Public Support for Innovation: Evidence for IrishManufacturing plants”,European Planning Studies [J] , 2009, 50(1) :107 - 122.
  • 10Lach, S. “Do R&D Subsidies Stimulate or Displace Private R&D? Evidence from Israel”. Working Paper:National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper, 2000.

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部