摘要
税务和解现象之出现,缘于税务确认、税务处罚和税务诉讼过程中特定法律事实之缺失,其具有普遍性;税务事实之复杂性和税务实践之限制性的客观矛盾构成了税务和解的正当性基础;协商民主论、税收债法论以及既有执法领域的和解操作分别为税务和解提供了理论支撑和实践借鉴;税务和解的制度化可以消弭这一现象本身的异化倾向,从而实现税务和解在我国的正当化。
As a prevalent phenomenon, tax reconciliation lies with its causes in many areas, especifically the lack of specific legal facts in processes of tax confirmation, tax penalty and tax litigation. It is the contradiction be- tween complicated facts and limited practice that make of the legitimate foundation of tax reconciliation. Respective- ly, theories of deliberative democracy & tax debt and existing practice provide theoretical & practical supports to tax reconciliation. Through institutionalizing, the dissimilation of tax reconciliation can be avoided, and the legitimacy of tax reconciliation can be established.
出处
《法学杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第8期40-48,共9页
Law Science Magazine
基金
国家自然科学基金资助项目"基于行为博弈的税收遵从实证研究"(批准号:71173242)
司法部2008-2010年度国家法治与法学理论研究项目和南京大学博士后基金课题"经济法实施机制研究"(批准号:08SFB2044)
中国法学会2011年度部级法学理论研究重点课题"宏观调控程序法律问题研究"[课题号:CLS(2011)B07]的部分研究成果
关键词
税务和解
法律事实
正当化
tax reconciliation legal pact legitimatize