期刊文献+

不首先使用核武器:中美核对话的困境与出路 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 这篇短论集中论述、分析了中美有关核问题的对话中最为核心的命题:不首先使用核武器承诺,诠释了美国为什么不肯做出"不首先使用"核武器承诺的历史背景和现实原因,分析了中美在此问题上的分歧和误解以及面临的困境,并尝试提出解决此种困境的方案。文章的辨析还表明,不首先使用核武器承诺关系到中美之间的战略稳定,且与中美之间能否建立战略互信密切相关,因而无论是严谨的学术探讨,还是切实的政策分析,都很有价值和意义。顾克冈博士和刘易斯博士是美国战略研究界,特别是从事核战略问题研究的中青年领军人物。他们从事核问题研究多年,并为政府和国会提供政策咨询。两位作者能在偏见根深蒂固的环境下,尝试以较为客观的方式诠释中美关系中的核问题,这不仅体现了他们的专业学识,更体现了他们的学术勇气。诚然,本刊编发此文,并非完全认可两位作者的观点,但他们的分析和见解,显然有助于国内同行和公众理解不首先使用核武器这个困扰中美核关系的重要议题。
出处 《外交评论(外交学院学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期95-101,共7页 Foreign Affairs Review
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1United Nations, " Report of the Secretary-General on the Work of the Organization", Document No. A/65, June 30, 1946, p. 11.
  • 2United Nations, "Resolution A/RES/2936(XXVII)", November 29, 1972.
  • 3McGeorge Bundy, George F. Kennan, Robert S. McNamara, Gerard Smith, "Nuclear Weapons and the At- lantic Alliance", Foreign Affairs, Vol. 60, Issue 4, Spring 1982, pp. 753-768.
  • 4For a critical responses to Bundy et al. , see the letters to the editor of Foreign Affairs . Stanley Kober, Earl C. Ravenal, Carl N. Anderson, Donald L. Hafner, "Letters to the Editor. The Debate Over No First Use", Foreign Af- fairs, Vol. 60, Issue 5, Summer 1982, pp. l171-1180.
  • 5Michael Howard, "Comment and Correspondence", Foreign Affairs, Vol. 61, Issue 1, Fall 1982, p. 211.
  • 6McGeorge Bundy and William J. Crowe, Jr. , "Reducing Nuclear Danger" , Foreign Affairs, Vol. 72, Issue 2, Spring 1993, pp. 140-155.
  • 7William J. Perry, Brent Scowcroft, and Charles D. Nuclear Weapons Policy, Council on Foreign Relations, 2009, Ferguson, Independent Task Force Report No. 62. U. S p. xiv.
  • 8For an account of Chinese perspectives on this meeting, see Jeffrey Lewis, "Declaratory Policy", Armscontrol- wonk. corn, January 4, 2010, http .//lewis. armscontrolwonk, com/archive/2583/declaratory-policy.
  • 9In 2008, an advisory board of former US officials including Paul Wolfowitz drafted a report to the Secretary of State recommending that the United States " make clear that it will not accept a mutual vulnerability relationship with China". The report was never formally issued by the International Security Advisory Board, most likely because its con- troversial recommendations could not command consensus of the board, and a draft version of the report was leaked to the Washington Times newspaper. See U.S. Department of State, International Security Advisory Board Task Force, "Draft Report . China's Strategic Modernization", http .//www. fas. org/nuke/guide/china/ISAB2008, pdf.
  • 10Bill Gertz, "China Report Urges Missile Shield", Washington Times, October 1, 2008.

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部