期刊文献+

自酸蚀粘接剂Adper Easy One的临床研究 被引量:14

Clinical study of Adper Easy One self-etch adhesive systems
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价一步法自酸蚀粘接剂Adper Easy One一年复诊期内的临床效果。方法临床选择有2颗恒磨牙面洞的患者27例,按随机数表选择其中一颗牙使用Adper Easy one自酸蚀粘接剂(自酸蚀组),另一颗牙使用Scotchbond酸蚀剂及Adper Single Bond2粘接剂(全酸蚀组),两颗牙均充填Filtek Z350树脂。术后即刻、1周、半年及1年复诊评价术后敏感,并按USPHS/Ryge标准评估充填体情况。结果自酸蚀组1例发生术后敏感,全酸蚀组2例发生术后敏感,两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。全酸蚀组1例充填体边缘不完整,自酸蚀组所有病例充填体边缘完整,两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。所有充填体颜色匹配、解剖学形态、表面质地均在1年复诊期内保持良好,未发生洞缘变色及继发龋。结论一步法自酸蚀粘接剂1年复诊期内术后敏感发生率低,临床效果保持良好。 Objective This study evaluated the clinical performance of a single-step self-etch adhesive system Adper Easy One over a one-year follow-up period. Methods Twenty-seven patients who had two permanent molar occlusal caries received following restorations: (1) single-step self-etching adhesive (Adper Easy one, 3M ESPE) was applied to one tooth following manufacturer's instructions; (2) two-step total-etching adhesive (Scotchbond, 3M ESPE; Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE) was applied to the other tooth as the control. Fihek Z350 (3M ESPE) was used as the restorative composite for all restorations. Postoperative sensitivity was evaluated, and the restorations were assessed according to USPHS/Ryge standard at baseline (instantly), after one week, half a year and one year of clinical service. Results Adper Easy One group had one case of postoperative sensitivity, while two cases in the total-etching adhesive group had postoperative sensitivity at one week visit, and there were no significant differences between the two groups (P 〉 0.05). One restoration in the total-etching adhesive group lost marginal integrity at one-year recall, and all other restorations were clinically acceptable, without significant differences between the two groups (P〉 0.05). The indicators of color match, anatomical form and surface roughness maintained sound in all restorations, without marginal staining and secondary caries. Conclusions One year follow up showed low postoperative sensitivity rate and satisfactory clinical performance of the single-step self-etch adhesive system.
出处 《中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版)》 CAS 2012年第4期27-30,共4页 Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition)
关键词 自酸蚀粘接剂 Ⅰ类洞 临床研究 Self-etch adhesive systems Type Ⅰ cavity Clinical study
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res, 1955, 34(6) : 849-853.
  • 2Gordan VV, Mjor IA. Short- and long-term clinical evaluation of post-operative sensitivity of a new resin-based restorative material and self-etching primer. Oper Dent, 2002,27(6) : 543-548.
  • 3Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J, 1980,30(4):347-358.
  • 4Perdigao J, Carmo AR, Geraldeli S, et al. Six-month clinical evaluation of two dentin adhesives applied on dry vs moist dentin. J Adhes Dent, 2001,3(4) : 343-352.
  • 5Van Meerbeek B, De Munok J, Yoshida Y, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent, 2003,28 ( 3 ) : 215-235.
  • 6Unemori M, Matsuya Y, Akashi A, et al. Composite resin restoration and postoperative sensitivity: clinical follow-up in an undergraduate program. J Dent, 2001, 29 ( 1 ) : 7-13.
  • 7Owens BM, Johnson WW, Harris EF. Marginal permeability of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems. Oper Dent, 2006,31 ( 1 ) : 60-67.
  • 8Frankenberger R, Tay FR. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations. Dent Mater, 2005,21(5) :397-412.
  • 9Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, et al. Five-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent, 2007,9 ( 1 ) : 7-10.
  • 10Kurokawa H, Miyazaki M, Takamizawa T, et al. One-year clinical evaluation of five single-step self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater J, 2007,26( 1 ) : 14-20.

同被引文献122

引证文献14

二级引证文献103

;
使用帮助 返回顶部