期刊文献+

复杂高层结构基于增量动力分析法的地震易损性分析 被引量:87

IDA-based seismic fragility analysis of a complex high-rise structure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 增量动力分析法(Incremental Dynamic Analysis,IDA)是一种以动力弹塑性时程分析为基础的参数分析方法,计算结构在不同地震动强度作用下的响应,能够反映结构体系随地震动强度的变化,经历弹性、弹塑性直至倒塌的全过程性能。而建筑结构的地震易损性是指在不同强度地震作用下结构达到或超过某种极限状态的条件概率。因此,增量动力分析的结果提供了结构地震易损性分析所需的数据。本文在增量动力分析的基础上,结合地震易损性分析,提出基于IDA的地震易损性分析方法,并采用该方法对某复杂超限高层结构进行抗震性能评估,得出该结构在3个地震水准下,超越5个极限状态的概率。研究表明,基于增量动力分析的易损性分析结果,可为预测重大工程结构的地震破坏和损失提供有力的科学依据。 Incremental Dynamic Analysis(IDA) is a parametric analysis method that emerges in several different forms to estimate more thoroughly structural performance under seismic loads.It involves subjecting a structural model to one(or more) ground motion record(s),each is scaled to multiple levels of intensity,thus producing one(or more) curve(s) of response parameterized versus intensity level and depicting the whole process of the structure from elastic to elastic-plastic until collapse.Seismic fragility analysis brings in fragility curves which are useful tools for showing the probability of structural damage due to earthquake as a function of ground motion indices.Results of IDA provide the data needed for producing fragility curves.In this paper IDA is combined with seismic fragility analysis and the IDA-based seismic fragility analysis method is proposed.A complex high-rise structure is taken as an example to illustrate the procedure.The probabilities of five limit states are exceeded for three given ground motion intensity levels,which are estimated,respectively.
出处 《地震工程与工程振动》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期19-25,共7页 Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51078274 51021140006) 上海市教育委员会科研创新项目重点项目
关键词 增量动力分析 地震易损性 易损性曲线 复杂高层 Incremental Dynamic Analysis seismic fragility analysis fragility curve complex high-rise structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1韩建平,吕西林,李慧.基于性能的地震工程研究的新进展及对结构非线性分析的要求[J].地震工程与工程振动,2007,27(4):15-23. 被引量:54
  • 2于晓辉, 吕大刚, 王光远. 土木工程结构地震易损性分析的研究进展// 第二届结构工程新进展国际论坛论文集, 大连, 2008:763-774.
  • 3FEMA. Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings . Report No. FEMA-350, SAC Joint Venture, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC, 2000.
  • 4Vamvatsikos D. Seismic performance, capacity and reliability of structures as seen through incremental dynamic analysis .Stanford: Stanford University, 2002.
  • 5周颖,吕西林,卜一.增量动力分析法在高层混合结构性能评估中的应用[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2010,38(2):183-187. 被引量:53
  • 6吕大刚.结构抗震可靠度二种简化解析表达式的一致性证明[J].地震工程与工程振动,2009,29(5):59-65. 被引量:29
  • 7Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. PEER strong motion database. California: Berkley, http://peer.berkeley.edu/peer_ground_motion_database.
  • 8DGJ 08-9-2003上海市建设和管理委员会.上海市工程建设规范建筑抗震设计规程[S].2003.
  • 9Luco N, Cornell C A. Effects of connection fractures on SMRF seismic drift demands [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2000, 126 (1): 127-136.
  • 10TBI Guidelines Working Group. Guidelines for performance-based seismic design of tall buildings . Report No. 2010/05, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California, 2010.

二级参考文献100

  • 1卢文生,吕西林.模态静力非线性分析中模态选择的研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2004,24(6):32-38. 被引量:25
  • 2卢文生,吕西林.框架剪力墙结构模态静力非线性抗震分析方法研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2005,25(1):58-66. 被引量:14
  • 3吕西林,朱杰江.高层建筑结构推覆分析及对设计的启示[J].建筑结构学报,2005,26(6):100-107. 被引量:7
  • 4Der Kiureghian A. Structural reliability methods for seismic safety assessment: a review [ J]. Engineering Structures, 1996,18 (6) : 412 -424.
  • 5Pinto P E. Reliability methods in earthquake engineering [ J ]. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, 2001, 3:76 -85.
  • 6Au S K, Beck J L. Subset simulation and its application to seismic risk based on dynamic analysis [ J ]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 2003,129(8) : 901 -917.
  • 7Franchin P. Reliability of uncertain inelastic structures under earthquake excitation [ J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 2004,130 (2) : 180 - 191.
  • 8Pinto P E, Giannini R, Franchin P. Seismic reliability analysis of structures [ M]. Pavia:lUSS Press,2004.
  • 9Comell C A. Risk-based structural design [ C ]//Proceedings of Symposium on Risk Analysis, Nowak A. , Ed. , Department of Civil Engineering, University of Michigan, 1994 : 37 - 48.
  • 10Cornell C A. Calculating building seismic performance reliability : a basis for multi-level design norms [ C ]//Proceedings of th 11 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, 1996:2122.

共引文献127

同被引文献722

引证文献87

二级引证文献295

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部