期刊文献+

一种带惩罚机制的一次性n人囚徒困境抱团性的扩展模型 被引量:3

Extended Model for Cooperation of a One-shot n Person Prisoner's Dilemma with a Punishment System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文给出一次n人囚徒困境的一个一般概念和一个一次n人双行动博弈(和n人对称双行动博弈)是囚徒困境的充要条件,证明了全体参与人都背叛是一次囚徒困境的唯一纯Nash均衡和唯一的期望均衡。给出了两种特殊形式的一次囚徒困境的充分条件。引进了惩罚函数和背叛愿意度等概念.研究表明,背叛愿意度这个概念包容了直观认识并能定量地解决直观上不能解决的问题。 In this paper,we give a general concept of an n-person one-shot prisoner 's dilemma and a necessary and sufficient condition for an n-person double action game(resp.n-person symmetrical double action game)is an n-person one-shot prisoner 's dilemma.It is proven that every player taking defection to be the unique pure Nash equilibrium and the unique expected equilibrium.Sufficient conditions for two special n-person one-shot prisoner 's dilemmas are given.The concepts of a player 's punishment function and preferring defection degree(PDD)are introduced.The research result shows that the concept PDD contains our intuitive understanding and can solve quantitatively problems that can not be solved by intuitive thinking.
作者 姜殿玉
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期102-106,共5页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70871051)
关键词 运筹学 抱团性 惩罚函数 一次n人囚徒困境 背叛愿意度 OR cooperation punishment function one-shot n person prisoner 's dilemma preferring defection degree(PDD)
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Robert A. The complexity of cooperation : agent-based models of competition and collaboration[ M ]. Princeton, New Jersey : Princeton University Press, 1997.
  • 2Axelrod R. Effective choices in the prisoner's dilemma[J]. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1980, 24: 3-25.
  • 3Axelrod R. More effective choices in the prisoner dilemma[ J]. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1980, 24: 379-403.
  • 4Boyd R, Lorberbaum J P, No pure strategy is evolutionary stable in the repeated prisoner' s dilemma[ J]. Nature, 1987, 327 : 58 -59.
  • 5Darwen P, Yao X. Co-evolution in iterated prisoner's dilemma with intermediate levels of eooperation: application to missile defense [ J]. International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Applications, 2002, 2 ( 1 ) : 83-107.
  • 6Fogel D. Evolving behaviours in the iterated prisoners dilemma[J]. Evolutionary Computation, 1993, 1 (1) : 77-97.
  • 7Scodel A, Sayer M J. The behavior of prisoners in a prisoner's dilemma' game[J]. Journal of Psychology, 1960, 50: 133-138.
  • 8Palomino F, Vega-Redondo F. Convergence of aspirations and(partial)cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma[ J]. Internation- al Journal of Game Theory, 1999, 28(4) : 465-488.
  • 9Joseph E, Harrlngton J. Cooperation in a one-shot prisoners' dilemma[J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 1995, 8(2) : 364-377.
  • 10Janssen M A. Evolution of cooperation in a one-shot prisoner' s dilemma based on recognition of trustworthy and untrustworthy agents [ J ]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2008, 65, 458-471.

二级参考文献11

  • 1Axelrod R. The complexity of cooperation: agent-based models of competition and collaboration, princeton[ M]. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1997.
  • 2Axelrod R. Effective choices in the prisoner's dilemma[J]. J. Conflict Resolution, 1980, 24: 3-25.
  • 3Axelrod R. More effective choices in the prisoner's dilemma[ J]. J. Conflict Resolution, 1980, 24: 379-403.
  • 4Boyd R, Lorberbaum J P. No pure strategy is evolutionary stable in the repeated prisoner's dilemma[ J]. Nature, 1987, 327: 58 -59.
  • 5Darwen P, Yao X. Co-evolution in iterated prisoner' s dilemma with intermediate levels Of cooperation: application to missile defense[ J]. International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Applications, 2002, 2 (1) : 83-107.
  • 6Fogel D. Evolving behaviours in the iterated prisoners dilemma[ J]. Evolutionary Computation, 1993, 1 (1) : 77-97.
  • 7Scodel A, Sayer M J. The behavior of prisoners in a' prisoner' s dilemma' game[J]. Journal of Psychology, 1960, 50: 133-138.
  • 8Palomino F, Vega-edondo F. Convergence of aspirations and(partial) cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma[ J]. Int J Game Theory, 1999, 28(4) : 465-488.
  • 9Joseph E, Harrington J. Cooperation in a one-shot prisoners' dilemma[ J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 1995, 8 (2) : 364-377.
  • 10Janssen M A. Evolution of cooperation in a one-shot prisoner' s dilemma based on recognition of trustworthy and untrustworthy agents[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2008, 65: 458-471.

共引文献1

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部