期刊文献+

A nationwide survey of diabetes education, self-management and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes in China 被引量:76

A nationwide survey of diabetes education, self-management and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background Diabetes management could be improved by diabetes education, through influencing attitudes towards diabetes, knowledge and behaviors of patients. The purpose of this study was to characterize the impact of diabetes education on glycemic control, and to assess the attitude, knowledge and self-care behavior in patients with type 2 diabetes in China. Methods This questionnaire-based survey was conducted in 50 medical centers across China from April to July of 2010. The patients with type 2 diabetes were eligible for the study. The information of glycemic control and diabetes education was collected. The diabetes attitude scale-3 formulae, a questionnaire of diabetes knowledge and Summary of Diabetes Self-care Activities scale were used to assess attitude, knowledge and the self-care of patients, respectively. Results Among the 5961 eligible respondents (3233 males; mean age (59.50+12.48) years; mean hemoglobin Alc (HbAlc) (8.27+2.23)%), most patients (79.8%) considered themselves educated on diabetes. Compared with patients without diabetes education, their educated counterparts showed significant lower value of HbAlc, after controlling for age, gender, body mass index and duration of diabetes (P 〈0.01). The patients who received diabetes education also performed significant higher scores on attitude, knowledge and self-care than their uneducated counterparts. Patients with lower income or education level tended to have higher glucose levels, and showed lower percentage of patients received diabetic education. Conclusions Chinese patients with diabetes education achieved better glycemic control than un-educated patients. Our study indicates effort is required to provide professional education to patients, with emphasis on lower income and lower education level populations. Background Diabetes management could be improved by diabetes education, through influencing attitudes towards diabetes, knowledge and behaviors of patients. The purpose of this study was to characterize the impact of diabetes education on glycemic control, and to assess the attitude, knowledge and self-care behavior in patients with type 2 diabetes in China. Methods This questionnaire-based survey was conducted in 50 medical centers across China from April to July of 2010. The patients with type 2 diabetes were eligible for the study. The information of glycemic control and diabetes education was collected. The diabetes attitude scale-3 formulae, a questionnaire of diabetes knowledge and Summary of Diabetes Self-care Activities scale were used to assess attitude, knowledge and the self-care of patients, respectively. Results Among the 5961 eligible respondents (3233 males; mean age (59.50+12.48) years; mean hemoglobin Alc (HbAlc) (8.27+2.23)%), most patients (79.8%) considered themselves educated on diabetes. Compared with patients without diabetes education, their educated counterparts showed significant lower value of HbAlc, after controlling for age, gender, body mass index and duration of diabetes (P 〈0.01). The patients who received diabetes education also performed significant higher scores on attitude, knowledge and self-care than their uneducated counterparts. Patients with lower income or education level tended to have higher glucose levels, and showed lower percentage of patients received diabetic education. Conclusions Chinese patients with diabetes education achieved better glycemic control than un-educated patients. Our study indicates effort is required to provide professional education to patients, with emphasis on lower income and lower education level populations.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2012年第23期4175-4180,共6页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 diabetes education SELF-MANAGEMENT glycemic control diabetes education self-management glycemic control
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Yang W, Lu J, Weng J, Jia W, Ji L, Xiao J, et al. Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1090-1101.
  • 2Gaede P, Lund-Andersen H, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 580-591.
  • 3UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352: 837-853.
  • 4Li G, Zhang P, Wang J, Gregg EW, Yang W, Gong Q, et al. The long-term effect of lifestyle interventions to prevent diabetes in the China Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Study: a 20-year follow-up study. Lancet 2008; 371:1783-1789.
  • 5Pi-Sunyer X, Blackburn (3, Brancati FL, Bray GA, Bright R, Clark JM, et al. Reduction in weight and cardiovascular disease risk factors in individuals with type 2 diabetes: one-year results of the look AHEAD trial. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 1374-1383.
  • 6Polonsky WH, Fisher L, t_iuzman S, Sleber W J, Philis-Tsimikas A, Edelman SV. Are patients' initial experiences at the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes associated with attitudes and self-management over time? Diabetes Educ 2010; 36: 828-834.
  • 7Funnell MM, Brown TL, Childs BP, Haas LB, Hosey GM, Jensen B, et al. National Standards for diabetes self-manage- ment education. Diabetes Care 2011; 34 Suppl 1: $89-$96.
  • 8World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects - Last amended with Note of Clarification on Paragraph 29 by the WMA General Assembly, Washington 2002, and Note of Clarification on Paragraph 30 by the WMA General assembly, Tokyo 2004. http : //www, wma. net/e/policy/b 3.htm.
  • 9Anderson RM, Fitzgerald JT, Funnell MM, Gruppen LD. Thethird version of the Diabetes Attitude Scale. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 1403-1407.
  • 10Speight J, Bradley C. The ADKnowl: identifying knowledge deficits in diabetes care. Diabet Med 2001; 18: 626-633.

同被引文献589

引证文献76

二级引证文献11636

;
使用帮助 返回顶部