期刊文献+

“善”与非自然性质——摩尔思想变迁考 被引量:1

"Good" and Non-natural Property: Moore's Changes in his Thought
下载PDF
导出
摘要 摩尔在《伦理学原理》中关于"善是非自然性质"这一观点的阐述并不令人信服,遭到了布劳德等人的批评。摩尔在与他人的讨论中,一方面承认自己的不足,另一方面吸收他人的合理见解,思想上产生了不小的变化。尽管摩尔并没有很好地解决自己的问题,但是就其对西方元伦理学的贡献和其"踏实求真"的学术态度而言,他仍然不失为一位伟大的思想家。 Moore's point of view that good is a kind of non-natural property in 'EthicaPrincipia' was not persuasive and encountered the criticisms from Broad et al. Duringthe discussions with other scholars, he on the one hand acknowledged his insufficiencies,on the other hand absorbed other's reasonable opinions, which caused some changes onhis thoughts. Although Moore did not solve his problem very well, speaking of hiscontribution to Meta-ethics and his striving for steadfastly and really academic manner,he was still a great thinker.
作者 杨松
机构地区 厦门大学哲学系
出处 《伦理学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期54-58,141,共5页 Studies in Ethics
基金 2012年教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目"语言分析与规范判断"(项目编号:12YJC720048)
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1乔治·摩尔.伦理学原理[M].长河.译.上海:上海出版世纪集团,2005:123.
  • 2Jamie Dreier. Was Moore a Moorean? [ A ]//Terry Horgan and Mark Timmons (ed.), Metaethics after Moore [ C 1. Oxford University Press Inc, 2006, pp. 197.
  • 3C. D. Broad. Moore' s Ethical Doctrines. [ A ]// Paul Arthur Schilpp( ed. ), The Philosophy of G.E. Moore [ C ]. Tudor Publishing Company, 1952.
  • 4G. E. Moore. A Reply To My Critics. [A]//Paul Arthur Schilpp( ed. ), The Philosophy of G.E. Moore[ C ]. Tudor Publishing Company, 1952.
  • 5G. E. Moore. The Conception of intrinsic Value. [ A ]// Philosophical Studies [ C ], Routledge, 2000, pp. 274.
  • 6路德·宾克莱.二十世纪伦理学[M].石家庄:河北人民出版社,1988.214.
  • 7玛丽·沃诺克.一九00年以来的伦理学[M],北京:商务印书馆,1987:12、17
  • 8Paul Arthur Schilpp (ed). The Philosophy of G. E. Moore[C], New York, 1952, p. 521.
  • 9G. E. Moore The Conception of in- trinsic Value. In Philosophical Studies, Routledge, 2000.

共引文献14

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部