期刊文献+

以时间为基础的质量管理实践与企业绩效间关系的实证研究

Empirical Research on Relationship between Time-Based Quality Management Practice and Firm Performance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以中美制造企业为调研对象,通过问卷调查收集数据,运用结构方程模型实证分析了以时间为基础的质量管理实践——预防性维修、供应商整合、工程再造计划和拉动式生产等与企业绩效的关系。研究结果表明:供应商整合、工程再造计划和拉动式生产对企业绩效产生直接的正向影响,其中拉动式生产的影响最显著;预防性维修、工程再造计划和拉动式生产通过影响供应商整合对企业绩效产生间接的正向影响,其中工程再造计划的影响最显著;实施拉动式生产和工程再造计划可提升企业绩效。 This paper collects the data through questionnaire survey in manufacturing firms from China and US,and builds a structural equation model to study empirically the relationship between firm performance and time-based quality management practice such as preventive mainte- nance, supplier integration, reengineering setup and pull production. The result shows as follows: supplier integration, reengineering setup and pull production have direct positive effects, and the impact of pull production is the most significant; preventive maintenance, reengineering setups and pull production have indirect positive effects through influencing supplier integration,and the impact of reengineering setup is the most sig- nificant;manufacturing firm could improve the performance through implementing pull production and reengineering setup.
作者 李奔波 蒋勇
出处 《技术经济》 CSSCI 2013年第5期121-127,共7页 Journal of Technology Economics
关键词 质量管理 时间基础理论 企业绩效 供应商整合 quality management practice time-based theory firm performance supplier integration
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1DEAN J, BOWEN D E. Management theory and total quality: improving research and practice through theory development[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1994,19 (3) :392-418,.
  • 2FLYNN B, SCHROEDER R G, SAKAKIBARA S. The impact of quality management practices on performance and competitive advantage[J]. Decision Sciences,1995,26 (5):659 - 691.
  • 3AHIRE S L,GOLHAR D Y,WALLER M A. Develop- ment and validation of TQM implementation constructs [J]. Decision Sciences, 1996,27(1) : 23-56.
  • 4RAHMAN S, BULLOCK P. Soft TQM, hard TQM, and organizational performance relationships: an empirical in- vestigation[J]. The International Journal of Management Science, 2005,33 : 73-83.
  • 5KAYNAK H. The relationship between total quality man- agement practices and their effects on firm performance [J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2003 (21) : 405- 435.
  • 6FENING F, PESAKOVIC G, AMARIA P. Relationship between quality management practices and the perform- ance of small and medium size enterprises(SMES) in Gha- na[J]. International Journal of Quality Reliability Management, 2008,25 (7) :694-708.
  • 7POWELL T C. Total quality management as competitive advantage:a review and empirical study[J]. Strategic Management Journal Chichester, 1995,16(1) : 15-38.
  • 8SANCHEZ-RODRIGUEZ C, MARTINEZ-LORENTE A R. Quality management practices in the purchasing func- tion:an empirical study[J]. International Journal of Oper- ations Production Management, 2004,24(7) : 666-687.
  • 9SOUSA R, VOSS C A. Quality management re-visited., a reflective review and agenda for future research[J]. Jour- nal of Operation Management, 2002,20 :91-109.
  • 10LAKHAL L, PASIN F, LIMAN M. Quality management practices and their impact on performance[J]. Interna- tional Journal of Quality Reliability Management, 2006,23(6) : 625-646.

二级参考文献58

  • 1[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1~10
  • 2[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980
  • 3[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588~ 606
  • 4[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238~ 246
  • 5[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247~ 255
  • 6[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315~ 353
  • 7[7]Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K A, Long J S eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 136~ 162
  • 8[8]Joreskog K G, Srbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1993
  • 9[9]Hu L, Bentler P M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 1998, 3: 424~ 453
  • 10[10]Hu L, Bentler P M. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, 6: 1~ 55

共引文献9017

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部