摘要
由于立法体例所限,立法者并未对《侵权责任法》第36条第2款所创立之通知规则的具体制度安排进行明确规定,这使得通知规则在司法实践中存在一定的不确定性,不利于民事主体权益的均衡保护及我国网络行业的健康有序发展。因此有必要综合考量我国网络社会实际情况及各方主体的利益关系,对权利通知的合格标准及其法律效果进行学理探讨和解释,从现实合理性角度界定合格权利通知的形式和实质要件,以类型化方式讨论权利通知的法律效果,并明确网络服务提供者审查义务的法律性质,以期为我国网络侵权的司法适用提出有益的建议。
Limited by Legislative system, legislator do not conduct detailed provision for notice rule which is crea- ted by Tort Law of the People' s Republic of China. This results in uncertainty in the legal practice and is harmful to civil subject' s legitimate rights and interests. So it' s necessary to discuss the application standards and legal effect of notice rule on the basis of consideration of the actual situation of our cyber society. Oh the one hand, we will define the form and substance conditions of qualified right notice and on the other, we will discuss the legal effect of right notice and the legal character of examination obligation which network service provider should under- take.
出处
《烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第3期26-34,共9页
Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
关键词
网络侵权
通知规则
网络服务提供者
internet infringement
notice rule
network service provider