留置针持续负压留置与单纯留置治疗耳廓假性囊肿的对比

Venous Indwelling Needle Drainage with or without Continuous Negative Pressure in Management of Auricular Pseudocyst

目的探讨静脉留置针持续负压留置治疗耳廓假性囊肿的优越性。方法 73例耳,确定诊断为耳廓假性囊肿,分为静脉留置针穿刺后留置及静脉留置针穿刺后持续负压留置两组,比较两组1次治愈率差异。结果 73例患耳全部治愈,但持续负压留置组1次治愈率与单纯静脉留置针穿刺组比较,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。结论静脉留置针持续负压留置治疗耳廓假性囊肿1次治愈率高,创伤小,病程短,简单易行。

Objective To investigate the advantages of continuous negative pressure combined with venous indwelling needle drainage in managing auricle Pseudocyst. Methods Seventy three patients diagnosed with auricle Pseudocyst were ran- domly selected to receive venous indwelling needle drainage with or without continuous negative pressure The first treatment cure rate was compared between the two groups. Results The auricular psudocyst resolved in all 73 cases after treatment, al- though the first treatment cure rate in patients with continuous negative pressure therapy was higher than those without （P〈 0.05）. Conclusion Venous indwelling needle drainage with continuous negative pressure appears to be advantageous over simple indwelling needle drainage in treating auricle pseudocyst with higher first treatment cure rate and is a minimal inva- sive and simple with quick results.