期刊文献+

高能电子束不同吸收剂量测量方法的比较研究 被引量:4

Comparison of the absorbed dose measurement methods for high-energy electron beams
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究国际原子能机构(IAEA)第398号报告和第277号报告在电子线放射治疗剂量测定的差异。方法采用圆柱型电离室、平行板电离室以及在用户高能电子线射线质下经过交叉校准的平行板电离室,分别依据两个报告,对医科达Precise加速器6档电子线在水中的吸收剂量进行精确测量。结果用平行板电离室根据两个报告的测量规程测得的吸收剂量的差异为0.4%~2.3%,用圆柱型电离室测出的差异为0.6%~2.2%,用经过交叉校准的平行板电离室测出的结果是0.5%~2.0%。依据IAEATRS-398和TRS-277报告的方法测得的吸收剂量具有较好的-致性。结论IAEATRS-398号报告关于电子线的校准方法较TRS-277号报告更精确,更加适用于临床用户进行测量。 Objective To study the difference in the measurement of the absorbed dose in water between the dosimetry protocols of IAEA TRS-398 and TRS-277 for high-energy electron beams. Methods The differences were compare in absorbed doses from 6 kinds of electron beams among the three methods of using cylindrical chamber ,plane-parallel chamber and cross-calibrated plane-parallel chamber which was calibrated in user' s high-energy electron beam according to IAEA TRS-398 and IAEA TRS-277. Results The difference in absorbed doses measured, following the two protocols, was 0.4% -2.3% for plane- parallel chamber, 0.6% -2.2% for cylindrical chamber,and 0. 5% -2. 0% for cross-calibrated chamber. The differences in measured absorbed doses between the two dosimetry protocols were slight. Conclusions The methods used to determine absorbed dose to water recommanded by IAEA TRS-398 for high-energy beams are more accurate and more suitable for clinical users to measure compared to the TRS-277.
出处 《中华放射医学与防护杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期314-317,共4页 Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
关键词 放射治疗 剂量学 吸收剂量 电离室 Radiotherapy Dosimetry Absorbed dose Ionization chamber
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1国家质量技术监督局.JJG589-2001外照射治疗辐射源.北京:中国标准出版社,2001.
  • 2International Atomic Energy Agency. Absorbed dose determination in photon and electron beams: an adaptation of the IAEA International codes of practice. IAEA technical reports series No. 277. 2nd ed. Vienna: IAEA, 1998 : 1-37.
  • 3International Atomic Energy Agency. Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy : an international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water. IAEA technical reports series No. 398. Vienna : IAEA, 2000 : 1-242.
  • 4Andreo P, Huq MS, Westermark M, et al. Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the 1AEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. Phys Med Biol,2002,47(17) :3033-3053.
  • 5Fourie OL. Comparison of linear accelerator photon outputs from the IAEA TRS-398 and TRS-277 codes of practice. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med,2008,31 ( 1 ) :24-31.
  • 6Huq MS,Andreo P. Advances in the determination of absorbed dose to water in clinical high-energy photon and electron beams using ionization chambers. Phys Med Biol, 2004,49 (4) 49-104.
  • 7姚杏红,陈立新,靳光华.不同指形电离室测量高能光子束吸收剂量的比较[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2012,32(4):412-415. 被引量:5
  • 8张园月,杨勇,黄扬,鄢玲,林滔.医用高能光子水吸收剂量测量规范TRS-277与TRS-398比较[J].中国测试,2009,35(2):14-17. 被引量:6
  • 9International Atomic Energy Agency. Implementation of the international code of practice on dosimetry in radiotherapy: review of testing results. IAEA technical reports series No. 398. Vienna : IAEA,2005 : 1-102.

二级参考文献12

  • 1黄扬,杨勇,张圆月,鄢铃,魏川.X、γ射线照射量(治疗水平)标准装置技术研究[J].中国测试技术,2005,31(6):32-35. 被引量:6
  • 2Palmans H, Nafaa L, de Patoul N, et al. A dosimetry study comparing NCS report-5, IAEA TRS-381, AAPM TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 in three clinical electron beam energies. Phys Med Biol, 2003, 48(9): 1091-1107.
  • 3Huq MS, Andreo P. Advances in the determination of absorbed dose to water in clinical high energy photon and electron beams using ionization chambers. Phys Med Biol, 2004, 49(4): 49-104.
  • 4Huq MS, Andreo P, Song HJ. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Phys Med Biol, 2001, 46(11): 2985-3006.
  • 5Andreo P, Huq MS, Westermark M, et al. Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. Phys Med Biol, 2002, 47(17): 3033-3053.
  • 6Araki F, Kubo HD. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols. Med Phys, 2002,29(5):857-868.
  • 7Fourie OL. Comparison of linear accelerator photon outputs from the IAEA TRS-398 and TRS-277 codes of practice. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med, 2008, 31(1): 24-31.
  • 8International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Technical Report Series No.277. Absorbed dose determination in photon and electron beams: an international code of practice. 2nd edition. Vienna: IAEA,1997:1-45.
  • 9International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Technical Report Series No.398. Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: an international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water. Vienna: IAEA,2006:1-229.
  • 10Palmans H, Nafaa L, De JJ, et al. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study. Phys Med Biol, 2002, 47(3): 421-440.

共引文献9

同被引文献35

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

;
使用帮助 返回顶部