期刊文献+

基于HO-DINA模型的多级评分认知诊断模型的开发 被引量:10

A Polytomous Extension of Higher-Order DINA Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文对具有较好发展前景的HO-DINA模型进行拓展,将仅适用于0-1评分数据资料的HO-DINA模型拓广至可用于多级评分,采用MCMC算法实现了对新模型参数的估计,并对新模型性能进行了研究。 Almost all cognitive diagnosis models are only adaptive for dichotomous data,which cannot meet the demands in real work and limit the application and development of cognitive diagnosis. In this paper,the dichotomous HO-DINA model was extended to a polytomous model,and the MCMC algorithm was employed to estimate its parameters. To explore the feasibility of the MCMC algorithm and the estimated precision,and to probe the properties of the polytomous HO-DINA model,the Monte Carlo method is used. There are two experiments. (1) In the first experiment,there were six cognitive attributes,60 test items and 500 examinees. The purpose of this experiment is to explore the feasibility of the MCMC algorithm and the estimated precision. (2) The second experiment is to study the properties of the polytomous HO-DINA model. In this experiment,the number of the cognitive attributes varied from 4 to 8. Simulation results: (1) Under the polytomous HO-DINA model,the estimation of the MCMC algorithm is fairly adequate,and its precision of item and ability parameters is great,which indicates the MCMC algorithm method is feasible. (2) The estimated precision of parameters and the attribute match ratio (MMR PMR) are decreasing with the increasing number of attributes. But the reverse is true for the estimated precision of parameters. (3) If PMR is asked to be higher than 80%,then the number of attributes is suggested not to be greater than seven.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第4期984-988,共5页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(31100756 31160203) 教育部人文社科项目(11YJC190002) 高等院校博士点基金项目(20123604120001 20103604120001) 江西师范大学青年英才培育资助计划等课题 江西教育科学规划项目(1YB088 17YB029)的资助
关键词 认知诊断模型 HO-DINA模型 多级评分HO-DINA模型 MCMC算法 cognitive diagnosis model High order DINA model polytomous HO-DINA model MCMC algorithm
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献56

  • 1戴海崎,张青华.规则空间模型在描述统计学习模式识别中的应用研究[J].心理科学,2004,27(4):949-951. 被引量:39
  • 2余嘉元.运用规则空间模型识别解题中的认知错误[J].心理学报,1995,27(2):196-203. 被引量:40
  • 3辛涛,焦丽亚.测量理论的新进展:规则空间模型[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2006,24(3):50-56. 被引量:21
  • 4Hartz, S., Roussos, L., & Stout, W. (2002). A bayesian framework for the unified model for assessing cognitive abilities :Blending theory with practicality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation ,University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign.
  • 5Henson, R. & Douglas, J.(2005). Test construction for cognitive diagnosis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29(4), 262-277.
  • 6Junker, B. M., & Sijtsma, K. (2001). Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement. 25(3), 258-272.
  • 7Leighton, J. E , Gierl, M., & Hunka, S. M. (2004). The attribute hierarchy method for cognitive assessment: A variation on Tatsuoka's rule-space approach. Journal of educational measurement, 41(3), 205-236.
  • 8Leighton, J. P., & Gierl, M. (2007). Cognitive diagnostic assessment for education : Theory and Applications. Cambridge (pp.242-274), UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • 9Maris, E. (1999). Estimating multiple classification latent class models. Psychometrika, 64(2), 187-212.
  • 10Rupp, A. A., & Templin, J. (2008). The effects of Q-Matrix misspecification on parameter estimates and classification accuracy in DINA model. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 68(1), 78-96.

共引文献99

同被引文献114

  • 1何学文,赵海鸣.支持向量机及其在机械故障诊断中的应用[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2005,36(1):97-101. 被引量:46
  • 2余嘉元.运用规则空间模型识别解题中的认知错误[J].心理学报,1995,27(2):196-203. 被引量:40
  • 3刘声涛,戴海崎,周骏.新一代测验理论—认知诊断理论的源起与特征[J].心理学探新,2006,26(4):73-77. 被引量:50
  • 4漆书青,戴海崎,丁树良.(2002).现代教育与心理测量学原理.北京:髙等教育出版社.
  • 5Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561-573.
  • 6Ansley, T. N.,& Forsyth, R. A. (1985). An examination of the characteristics of unidimensional IRT parameter estimates derived from two-dimensional data. Applied Psychological Measurement, P(l), 37-48.
  • 7Bradlow, E. T.’ Wainer, H., & Wang, X. H. (1999). A bayesian random effects model for testlets. Psychometrika, (54(2),153-168.
  • 8Christoffersson, A. (1975). Factor analysis of dichotomized variables. Psychometrika, 40{\)y 5-32.
  • 9Cyr, A., & Davies, A. (2006). Item Response Theory and Latentvariable modeling for surveys with complex sampling design the case of the National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth in Canada. Paper presented at the conference of the Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology, Office of Management and Budget, Arlington, VA.
  • 10de La Torre, J,, & Douglas, J. A. (2004). Higher-order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis. Psychometrika, 69(3), 333-353.

引证文献10

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部