期刊文献+

Lenke 1型青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者不同上端融合椎对术后双肩平衡的影响 被引量:7

Influence of upper fused vertebra on postoperative shoulder balance for Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨不同上端融合椎对术前双肩水平的Lenke1型青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(adolescent idiopath-ic scoliosis,AIS )患者术后双肩平衡的影响。方法:选取2006年6月-2009年6月在我院行后路主胸弯融合术并有2年以上完整影像学随访资料的32例Lenke1型AIS患者。所有患者术前均表现为双肩水平,其中男6例,女26例,手术时年龄13-19岁,平均14.9岁,上胸弯Cobb角平均为23.7°±8.0°(10°-36°),主胸弯Cobb角平均47.5°±6.9°(40°-62°)。按照上端融合椎不同将AIS患者分为两组:A组,上端融合椎为T3,19例;B组,上端融合椎为T4,13例。A组患者的手术时年龄、Risser征、上胸弯及主胸弯柔韧度与B组比较均无统计学差异(P〉0.05)。采用方差分析比较两组患者术前、术后1年和末次随访时的上胸弯及主胸弯Cobb角、顶椎及躯干偏移距离、影像学肩关节高度差(radiographic shoulder height, RSH)、喙突高度差(CPH)和锁骨角(CA)。结果:A组随访时间2-4.5年,平均3.6±1.3年;B组随访时间2-4.8年,平均3.1±2.1年,两组比较无统计学差异(P〉0.05)。术前、术后1年和末次随访时,A组患者的上胸弯Cobb角、主胸弯Cobb角、顶椎及躯干偏移距离、RSH、CPH及CA与B组比较均无统计学差异(P〉0.05)。A、B两组患者术后1年和末次随访时的上胸弯Cobb角、主胸弯Cobb角、顶椎及躯干偏移距离、RSH、CPH、CA分别与术前比较均有显著性改善(P〈0.05);末次随访时,两组患者的上胸弯Cobb角及RSH、CPH、CA较术后1年均显著减小(P〈0.05),均获得较满意的双肩平衡。结论:对于术前双肩水平的Lenke1型AIS患者,上端融合椎为T3或T4对重建术后双肩平衡的疗效无明显差别;对此类患者上端融合至T4即可获得良好的矫形效果和满意的双肩平衡。 Objectives: To analyze the influence of upper fused vertebra on postoperative shoulder balance in Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis(AIS) patients with preoperative leveled shoulders. Methods: A to- tal of 32 Lenke type 1 AIS patients with preoperative leveled shoulders was included in the study. There were 6 boys and 26 girls with an average age of 14.9 years old(range, 13-19 years). The average preopera- tive proximal thoracic curve was 23.7°±8.0°(range 10°-36°), and the average preoperative main thoracic curve was 47.5°±6.9°(range 40°-62°). Thirty-two patients undergoing posterior thoracic fusion were divided into two groups: group A(n=19) included those who had a proximal fusion to T3; group 2(n=13) included those who had a proximal fusion to T4. There was no significant difference in demographics or baseline characteristics between group A and B including age at operation, Risser stage, flexibility of proximal and main thoracic (PT and MT) curves(P〉0.05). Based on analysis of variance, radiographic parameters were compared among preoperation, 1 year follow-up and the final follow-up including PT and MT curve Cobb angle, apical verte- bral translation(AVT), trunk shift, radiographic shoulder height(RSH), coracoids process beight(CPH) and clavi-cle angle(CA). Results: In group A, the follow-up time ranged from 2 to 4.5 years with an average time of 3.6±1.3 years; while in group B, the follow-up time ranged from 2 to 4.8 years with a mean time of 3.1±2.1 years, which showed no difference between two groups(P〉0.05). At preoperation, 1 year follow-up and the fi- nal follow-up, there were no significant differences in radiographic outcomes between group A and B includ- ing PT and MT curve Cobb angle, AVT, trunk shift, RSH, CPH and CA(P〉0.05). For all patients, PT and MT curve Cobb angle, AVT, trunk shift, RSH, CPH and CA at 1 year follow-up and the final follow-up were both better than those before surgery(all P〈0.05); while the values of RSH, CPH and CA at final fol- low-up were lower than those at 1 year follow-up(P〈0.05). All patients obtained the balanced shoulders after surgery. Conclusion: For the Lenke type 1 AIS patient with leveled shoulder, proximal fusion to T4 can pro- duce equivalent correction of scoliosis and shoulder balance.
出处 《中国脊柱脊髓杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第8期706-710,共5页 Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord
基金 卫生部公益性行业专项基金资助(编号:201002018)
关键词 青少年特发性脊柱侧凸 LENKE 1型 双肩平衡 上端融合椎 Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Lenke type 1 Shoulder balance Upper fused vertebra
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Maurice B, Jean-Marie G, Jean-Michel T. Taking the shoul- ders and pelvis into account in the preoperative classification of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents and young adults (a constructive critique of King's and Lenke's systems of classi- fication) [J]. Eur Spine J, 2011, 20(10): 1780-1787.
  • 2Qiu XS, Ma WW, Li WG, et al. Discrepancy between radio- graphic shoulder balance and cosmetic shoulder balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with double thoracic curve[J]. Eur Spine J, 2009, 18(1): 45-51.
  • 3Smyrnis PN, Sekouris N, Papadopoulos G. Surgical assessment of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathicscoliosis[J]. Eur Spine J, 2009, 18(4): 522-530.
  • 4Rose PS, Lenke LG. Classification of operative adolescent id- iopathic seoliosis: treatment guidelines[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2007, 38(4): 521-529, vi.
  • 5Kuklo TR, Lenke LG, Won DS, et at. Spontaneous proximal thoracic curve correction after isolated fusion of the main thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic seoliosis [J]. Spine, 2001, 26(18): 1966-1975.
  • 6Bago J, Carrera L, March B, et at. Four radiologieal measures to estimate shoulder balance in seoliosis[J]. J Pediatr Orthop B, 1996, 5(1): 31-34.
  • 7Lee CS, Chung SS, Shin SK, et at. Changes of upper thoracic curve and shoulder balance in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by anterior selective thoracic fusion using VATS[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2011, 24(7): 462-468.
  • 8倪春鸿,李明,戴炳华,刘洋,许明,宋元进,侯铁胜.特发性脊柱侧凸患者肩部失平衡的临床分析及其意义[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(8):576-581. 被引量:4
  • 9Suk SI, Lee SM, Chung ER, et al. Selective thoracic fusion with segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: more than 5-year follow-up [J]. Spine, 2005, 30(14): 1602-1609.
  • 10Matsumoto M, Watanabe K, Ogura Y, et al. Short fusion strategy for Lenke type 1 thoracic curve using pediele screw fixation[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2013, 26(4): 93-97.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Lenke L,Betz R,Harms J,et al.Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis:a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis[J].J Bone Joint Surg (Am),2001,83 (8):1169-1181.
  • 2Kuklo TR,Lenke LG,Graham EJ,et al.Correlation of radiographic,clinical,and patient assessment of shoulder balance following fusion versus nonfusion of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis[J].Spine,2002,27 (18):2013-2020.
  • 3Ponseti IV,Friedmann B.Prognosis in idiopathic scoliosis[J].J Bone Joint Surg(Am),1950,32(2):381-395.
  • 4King H,Moe JH,Bradford DS,et al.The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis[J].J Bone Joint Surg (Am),1983,65 (9):1302-1313.
  • 5Lenke LG,Birdwell KH,O'Brien MF,et al.Recognition and treatment of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation[J].Spine,1994,19(14):1589-1597.
  • 6Suk SI,Kim WJ,Lee CS,et al.Indications of proximal thoracic curve fusion in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis:recognition and treatment of double thoracic curve pattern in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with segmental instrumentation[J].Spine,2000,25(18):2342-2349.
  • 7Kuklo TR,Lenke LG,Wn DS,et al.Spontaneous proximal thoracic curve correction after isolated fusion of the main thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis[J].Spine,2001,26(18):1966-1975.
  • 8Winter RB.The idiopathic double thoracic curve pattern:its recognition and surgical management[J].Spine,1989,14(12):1287-1292.
  • 9Winter RB,Denis F.The King V curve pattern:its analysis and surgical treatment[J].Orthop Clin North Am,1994,25(2):353-362.
  • 10Lee CK,Denis F,Winter RB,et al.Analysis of the upper thoracic curve in surgically treated idiopathic scoliosis:a new concept of double thoracic curve pattern[J].Spine,1993,18 (12):1599-1608.

共引文献3

同被引文献98

引证文献7

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部