摘要
目的:在中国大学生群体中修订多维状态无聊量表(theMultidimensionalStateBoredomScale,MSBS)中文版并检验其信效度。方法:采用中文版MSBS调查了1668名大学生,收回有效问卷1545份,以检验其结构效度、内部一致性信度和分半信度。另用大学生无聊倾向量表、流调中心抑郁量表、状态孤独量表、状态焦虑量表在218名大学生中检验效标关联效度。1个月后随机抽取172名大学生进行重测,检验其重测信度。结果:中文版MSBS包括注意缺乏、时间知觉、低唤醒、高唤醒和脱离5个分量表,共24个条目,其因素建构得到探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析的支持;5个分量表的内部一致性信度在O.67~0.81之间,分半信度在0.50~0.72之间,重测信度在0.50~0.56之间;5个分量表都具有较好的效标关联效度;中国大学生的状态无聊具有性别差异。结论:MSBS中文版在中国大学生群体中具有良好的适用性。
Objective: To introduce and investigate the psychometric attributes of the Chinese version of the Multidi- mensional State Boredom Scale(MSBS). Methods: 1668 university students were asked to complete the Chinese version of MSBS. 218 of the 1668 students were additionally asked to complete the Colleges Students' Boredom Proneness Scale, The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale(CES-D), State Loneliness Scales(SLS) and State Anxiety Invento- ry(SAI). 172 of the 1668 students were chosen to complete the Chinese Version of MSBS after 1 month. Results: Ex- ploratory and confirmatory factor analyses yielded five reliable subscales measuring state levels of boredom-related time perception, disengagement, high arousal, low arousal and inattention, with Cronbach's ot of these subscales ranged from 0.67 to 0.81; the test-retest reliabilities of them ranged from 0.50 to 0.56; the split-half reliability ranged from 0.50 to 0.72. They were very good of the criterion-related validity. There were significant differences in the state boredom between gender. Conclusion: The Chinese version of MSBS can be used as an effective instrument to assess the boredom status of Chinese college students.
出处
《中国临床心理学杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2013年第4期558-561,540,共5页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金
2012年黑龙江省研究生创新科研项目(YJSCX2012-163HLJ)
关键词
状态无聊
效度
信度
State boredom
Validity
Reliability