期刊文献+

网上评卷的实践与思考:香港公开考试视角 被引量:1

Reflections on the Practice of Onscreen Marking: The Case of Hong Kong Public Examinations
原文传递
导出
摘要 网上评卷作为一种新型评卷形式,对提高评卷效率、控制评卷误差具有重要的现实意义。文章系统回顾了国际领域网上评卷的实施情况,并报告了香港考试及评核局针对香港中学会考网上评卷的实施情况所开展的一系列验证性研究。研究结果表明:(1)网上评卷和纸质评卷所得分数具有可比性;(2)采用网上评卷不会对考生分数产生影响;(3)评分员对于评分模式的倾向不存在偏倚。文章还提出了日后网上评卷研究的研究重点和发展方向,对其他国家和地区开展网上评卷有一定借鉴和启示作用。 Onscreen marking (OSM), as one of the emerging marking mediums, can perform an important role in improving marking quality and reducing marking errors. The current paper lays out the uptake of OSM worldwide and outlines a series of validation studies conducted for the English subject of Hong Kong Certificate of Education Examination (HKCEE) with the support of the Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority (HKEAA). Results of the validation studies showed that (1) scores obtained from OSM were statistically comparable to those from paper-based marking (PBM); (2) OSM did not affect candidates’ scores, with candidates receiving comparable scores in either OSM or PBM; (3) markers’ attitudes towards OSM were overall positive. The paper ends with some observations regarding further avenues for investigation into the effectiveness and applicability of OSM, providing implications for the use of OSM in other contexts.
出处 《当代外语研究》 2013年第8期14-19,30,共7页 Contemporary Foreign Language Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Adams,C.2005.How does assessment differ when e-marking replaces paper-based marking? [R].The 31st Annual International Association for Educational Assessment Conference,Abuj a, Nigeria.
  • 2Attali,Y.& J.Bursteia 2006.Automated essay scoring with e-rater v.2 [J].Joumalof Technology,Learning,and Assessment (3):3-29.
  • 3Bond,T.G.&-C M Fox.2007.Applying the Rasch Model:Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences (2nd edition) [M].Mahwah,N.J.:Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • 4Coniam,D.1991.Essay marking:A comparison of criterion-referenced and norm-referenced marking [J].Institute of Language in Education Journal (7):154-64.
  • 5Coniam,D.2008.An investigation into the effect of raw scores in determining grades in a public examination of writing [J].Japan Association for Language Teaching Journal (1):69-84.
  • 6Coniam,D.2009a.A comparison of onscreen and paper-based marking in the Hong Kong public examination system [J].Educational Research and Evaluation (3):243-63.
  • 7Coniam,D.2009b.Discrepancy essays:Natural phenomenon or problem to be solved [J].Melbourne Papers in Language Testing (2):1-31.
  • 8Coniam,D.2010a.Validating onscreen marking in Hong Kong [J].Asia Pacific Education Rexnezv (3):423-31.
  • 9Coniam,D.2010b.Examining negative attitudes towards onscreen marking in Hong Kong [J],Education Journal (1-2):71-87.
  • 10Coniam,D.2010c.The comparability of marking on screen and on paper:The case of Liberal Studies in Hong Kong [J].Journal of Educational Technology Systems (4):453-69.

二级参考文献19

共引文献35

同被引文献10

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部