期刊文献+

不同干燥方式芒果脆片香气成分分析 被引量:38

Analysis of Aroma Components in Mango Chips Prepared by Different Drying Methods
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为研究干燥方式对芒果脆片香气成分和含量的影响,运用气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)联用技术,分别对芒果鲜样及4种不同干燥方式处理的芒果脆片的香气成分进行测定与分析。结果表明,芒果鲜样主要芳香成分为:萜烯类物质66.25%,以δ-3-蒈烯、4-蒈烯及反式石竹烯为主;醇类物质12.42%,以3,6-亚壬基-1-醇为主;烷烃类物质19.26%。热风干燥处理后产生较多酯类、醛类和烷烃类,损失较多的萜烯类物质,芒果鲜样的特征香味有较大的损失;微波真空干燥处理除萜烯类和醇类物质减少外,其余风味物质均增加;与其他3种干燥方式相比,真空冷冻干燥处理后萜烯类物质损失最大,烷烃类物质增加最多,且其中的酚类物质含量最高。相对于其他3种干燥方式,芒果鲜样经过变温压差膨化干燥处理后,表征芒果鲜样特征风味的萜烯类成分损失最少,醛类物质的含量也较高,同时还含有酚类物质。 Gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used to analyze aroma components of fresh mango samples and mango chips prepared by four different drying methods. The results showed that the main aroma components of fresh mango sample were 66.25% terpenes (mainly ^-3-carene, 4-carene and caryophyllene), 12.42% alcohols (mainly 3,6-nonadien-l-ol) and 19.26% alkanes. More ester, aldehyde, and alkane compounds were produced while terpenes showed an obvious reduction during hot-air drying. Meanwhile, obvious loss of some characteristic aroma compounds in fresh mango was observed. The contents of all other aroma compounds were increased except terpenes and alcohols by microwave vacuum drying. Compared with three other drying methods, the most significant loss of terpenes but the most obvious increase in alkanes were observed accompanied with the highest concentration of phenolic compounds during vacuum freeze drying. Compared with samples dried by three other methods, mango chips by explosion puffing drying showed the least loss of terpenes, which were considered as the characteristic aroma components in flesh mango. The concentrations of aldehydes were also high and phenolic compounds were also found.
出处 《食品科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第22期179-184,共6页 Food Science
基金 "十二五"国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAD31B03) "十二五"农村领域国家科技计划项目(2012BAD31B06)
关键词 干燥方式 芒果 芳香成分 变温压差膨化干燥 drying methods mango aroma components explosion puffing drying
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1陶晨,王道平,杨小生,等.固相微萃取气相色谱质谱法分析芒果中的香气成分[J].黔南名族医专学报,2009,22(4):241-242;247.
  • 2VILLA-CORRALES L, FLORES-PRIETO J J, XAMAN- VILLASEIC'IOR J P, et al. Numerical and experimental analysis of heat and moisture transfer during drying of Ataulfo mango[J]. Journal of Food Engineering, 2010, 98(2): 198-206.
  • 3余锦春.脱水芒果块生产线的研究[J].食品工业科技,1995,16(4):15-18. 被引量:4
  • 4陈燕,陈羽白.荔枝的微波干燥特性及其对品质的影响研究[J].农业工程学报,2004,20(4):192-194. 被引量:55
  • 5张峻松,王建民,张文叶,王花俊.超高压处理对芒果汁香气成分的影响[J].中国食品学报,2008,8(2):118-122. 被引量:17
  • 6TORRES J D, CHIRALT A, ESCRICHE I. Development of volatile fraction of fresh cut osmotically treated mango during cold storage[J]. Food Chemistry, 2012, 130(4): 921-927.
  • 7胡国栋.固相微萃取技术的进展及其在食品分析中应用的现状[J].色谱,2009,27(1):1-8. 被引量:78
  • 8SIMPSON R F,/vIILLER G C. Aroma composition of Chardonnay wine[J]. Vitis, 1984, 23: 143-158.
  • 9DEA S, BRECHT J K, NUNES M C N, et al. Quality of fresh-cut 'Kent' mango slices prepared from hot water or non-hot water- treated fruit[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2010, 56(2): 171-180.
  • 10TORRES J D, TALENS P, CAROT J M, et al. Volatile profile of mango (Mangifera indica L.), as affected by osmotic dehydration[J]. Food Chemistry, 2007, 101(1): 219-228.

二级参考文献140

共引文献225

同被引文献513

引证文献38

二级引证文献331

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部