期刊文献+

钻孔灌注桩抗压承载力试验方法的对比分析 被引量:3

Comparative analysis on compressive bearing capacity test methods of the drilled grouting pile
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对苏州轨道交通2号线太平车辆段上盖物业开发项目钻孔灌注桩工程,采用堆载法和自平衡法进行抗压承载力静载试验。概述了本次试验情况,整理了试验数据,并将堆载法与自平衡法试验数据进行了对比分析,得出了本工程中自平衡法修正系数K的取值。分析结果表明:两种试验方法均取得了较好的效果,自平衡法表现出一定的优越性。 The drilled grouting pile engineering of Taipingcheliang project on Suzhou metro line two has been tested using the traditional piling-up weights method and the self-balanced method to carried out the compressive bearing capacity test. Tests were overviewed as well as the data to compare two different methods. Correction factor K of self-balanced method in this project was achieved. Results indicate that both of two test methods are effective while self-balanced method is better.
出处 《建筑结构》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第20期96-99,共4页 Building Structure
关键词 钻孔灌注桩 堆载法 自平衡法 Q-S曲线 修正系数 drilled grouting pile traditional piling-up weights method self-balanced method Q-s curve correetion factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1DGJ32/TJ77-2009基桩自平衡法静载试验技术规[S].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,2009.

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部