期刊文献+

组织公平与人力资源管理关系实践的交互作用机制研究 被引量:13

An Study on the Interaction Mechanism of Organizational Justice and Guanxi Practice of HRM
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究以西方管理理论与中国传统文化现象的冲突与融合为背景,以组织公平和HRM关系实践对情感承诺和员工创新行为的交互作用为研究问题,通过对372位员工的问卷调查,运用回归分析方法,发现:(1)组织公平包含两种内涵,西方管理强调的一致性对待和传统文化的权变式公平;HRM关系实践会使个体对组织公平持传统观点,并将组织理解为私人关系实现交换的社交场域;(2)HRM关系实践在态度层面会降低员工对组织的信任,程序公平感和情感依附水平,对组织公平与情感承诺之间关系起负向调节作用;在行为层面表面上对员工创新行为有显著且正向的影响,但无益于员工内在工作动机和对组织忠诚感的培养。 Setting in the conflict and acculturation of the western management theory and Chinese traditionary cultural phenomenon, this study investigated the interaction effect of organizational justice and guanxi practice of HRM on affec-tive commitment and employee innovative behavior. Through the survey of 372 employees, regression analysis revealed that organizational justice could be interpreted as absolute fairness brought by western management theory and rooted in traditional culture that acted as maintaining harmonious circumstances. Guanxi practice of HRM can induce the latter connotation and make individuals perceive the organization as social intercourse circumstance. It not only decreased trust, perceived procedural justice, and affective attachment of employees, but also moderated the relationship between organizational justice and affective commitment. It influenced employee innovative behavior positively on the surface, but harmed employees’ intrinsic work motivation and loyalty actually.
出处 《预测》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第1期15-20,共6页 Forecasting
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70672052) 国家社会科学基金资助项目(10BGL002)
关键词 组织公平 人力资源管理的关系实践 情感承诺 员工创新行为 organizational justice guanxi practice of HRM affective commitment employee innovative behavior
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1俞彬彬,钟建安.情绪智力、组织公平和组织公民行为关系的研究[J].心理科学,2008,31(2):475-478. 被引量:23
  • 2孟太生,刘璞,井润田.基于组织公平的变革型领导行为与组织公民权行为关系的实证研究[J].科研管理,2007,28(6):123-129. 被引量:15
  • 3马飞,孔凡晶.组织公平理论研究述评[J].经济纵横,2010(11):121-125. 被引量:29
  • 4Meyer J P, Stanley D J, Herscovitch L, et al.. Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: a meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences [ J ]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2002, 61 ( 1 ) : 20-52.
  • 5Cohen-Charash Y, Spector P E. The role of justice in organizations: a meta-analysis [J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2001, 86 (2): 278-321.
  • 6Colquitt J A. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure [ J-. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86 (3) : 386-400.
  • 7Whitman D S, Caleo S, Carpenter N C, et al.. Fairness at the collective level: a meta-analytic examination of the consequences and boundary conditions of organizational justice climate [ J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2012. 97(4): 776-791.
  • 8Elanain H M A. Testing the direct and indirect relation- ship between organizational justice and work outcomes in a non-western context of the UAE [J]. Journal of Management Development, 2010, 29( 1 ): 5-27.
  • 9Simosi M. The role of social socialization tactics in the relationship between socialization content and newcom- ers' affective commitment [ J ]. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2010, 25(3-4) : 301-327.
  • 10Vandenberghe C, Bentein K. A closer look at the relation- ship between affective commitment to supervisors and organizations and turnover [ J ]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2009, 82(2): 331-348.

二级参考文献109

共引文献831

同被引文献251

引证文献13

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部