期刊文献+

中欧上市公司审计监管合作法律问题研究 被引量:3

Legal Issues on the Sino-European Cooperations between the Oversight Authorities of Auditors for Listed Companies
原文传递
导出
摘要 审计是上市公司信息披露质量的保证,对于完善公司治理结构具有重要意义;资本流动的全球化使得上市公司审计监管的国际合作十分必要。就此而言存在着两种主要模式:以美国萨班斯法为代表的信任本国和域外监管模式,以及以欧盟公司法第8号指令为代表的相互信任和母国监管模式。欧盟于2011年对我国上市公司的审计监管体制作出等效性认定,为中国和欧盟成员国的合作开创了重要条件,也对中美谈判产生了积极影响。中国应充分利用欧盟的等效性认定,完成与欧盟成员国的谈判并缔结工作安排,完善有关立法,并联合欧盟应对美国的联合检查要求。 Audit service is the importance guarantee of the quality of information disclosure by the public companies.It constitutes a vital aspect to the improvement of the corporate governance.The internationalization of the capital flowing results in the cross-border audit service,and makes it necessary to cooperate with each other for the oversight authorities of auditors.There are mainly two models on this aspect;the reliance on the own country's regulator and the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the America Sabanes-Oxley Act,and the mutual reliance and home country regulation doctrine of the new EU 8th Company Directive of 2006,which respectively represent the unilateralism and multilateralism.The European multilateralism is more favorable in terms of the protection of Chinese national interest.The decision of equivalence of Chinese public oversight,quality assurance,investigation and penalty systems for auditors and audit entities given by European Commission in 2011 marks a significant step for the Sino-European cooperation on the audit regulators,bringing positive influence on the Sino-US negotiation on the matter.Chinese authority should make full use of the European decision,finish the mutual negotiations and sign working arrangements with the member states.It will be helpful for Chinese authority to improve its regulations and get the adequacy decision of EU.China should resist,jointly with EU,the position of joint inspections of US.
作者 石佳友
出处 《法学家》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第1期142-152,179,共11页 The Jurist
基金 作者参加的教育部人文社科重点研究基地项目(项目批准号:08JJDGJW254)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 审计 等效性 充分性 相互信任 母国监管 Audit Equivalence Adequacy Mutual Reliance Home Country Regulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Barbara Crutchfield George & Kathleen A. Lacey, "A Comparative Analysis nl Post-3art)anes-oxley torporate t,overn- ante Developments in the US and European Union: The Impact of Tensions Created by Extraterritorial Application of Seetion 404", 53 The American Journal f Comparative lxw( 2006).
  • 2Balazs Fekete, "Recent Trends in Extraterritorial Jurisdiction-The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Its Implications on Sovereign- ly". 49 Actn Juridica Hungariea( 2008).
  • 3Marianne Ojo, "The Role of the IASB and Auditing Standards in the Aftermath of the 2008/2009 Financial Crisis", 16 EurqJean Ixtw Journal(2010).
  • 4Dinh Tran Ngoc Huy, "The Backbone of European Corporate Governance Standards after Financial Crisis, Corporate Scandals and Manipulation", 1 Asian Journal f Management and Business Sciences(2011).
  • 5See Jamal lbrahim Haidar, "Investor protections and eeonmnic growth", 103 Eeortomics Letter, s(2009), p. 2.
  • 6Klaus J. ttopt, "Modern Company and Capital Market Problems: Improving European Corporate Governance after Enron", in John Armour & Joseph A. MeCahery( ed. ), After Enron: hnproving Corporate Law and Modernising Securities Regulation in Ettrope and the US, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006, p. 44.
  • 7See Jill E. Fisch, "Rethinking the regulation of securities intermediaries", 158 University of Pennsylvania Law Review(2010), p. 1961.
  • 8See Donald C. Clark, "Nothing but Wind? The Past and Future of Comparative Corporate Governance", 59 American Journal of Compara- tive lnw(2fll 1 ), p 79.
  • 9杨晶晶.中欧政府审计和法定审计对比小议——由中欧实现审计公共监管等效引发的思考[J].时代金融,2011(5X):10-10. 被引量:2
  • 10欧盟认可中国审计监管体系等效[J].中国注册会计师,2011(4):112-113. 被引量:3

二级参考文献26

  • 1杨顺华,杨海濒,沃夫冈.米勒.欧盟采纳国际会计准则现状分析[J].财会通讯(上),2005(8):96-96. 被引量:2
  • 2刘鹏.云计算-将计算变成水和电.中国计算机学会通讯,2009,(10):49-54.
  • 3Graham Greenleaf. Global data privacy laws: 89 countries, and accelerating[ J ]. Privacy Laws & Business International Report, 2012, ( 115 ).
  • 4Graham Pearce & Nicholas Plattern. Orchestrating Translantie Approches to Personal Data Protection: A European Perspective[ J ]. Fordham International Law Journal, 1998, ( 22 ).
  • 5Ryan Moshell. And Then There Was One: The Outlook for a Self-Regulatory United States Amidst a Global Trend l'oward Comprehensive Data Protection[ J ]. Texas Tech Law Review, 2005, ( 37 ).
  • 6Sunni Yuen. Exporting trust with data: audited self-regulation as solution to cross-border data transfer protection :oneerns in the offshore outsourcing industry[ J ].The Columbia Science and Technology Law Review, 2008, ( 9 ).
  • 7James Q. Whitman. The Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity versus Liberty[ J ]. The Yale Law Journal, 2004, ( 4 ).
  • 8Omer Tene & Yucel Saygin. Privacy and Data Protection in Turkey : ( Inching ) Towards a European Framework [ J ]. Privacy & Security Law Report, 1467, 2011, ( 10 ).
  • 9Hfiseyin Can Aksoy. The Right to Personality and Its Different Manifestations as the Core of Personal Data[ J ]. Ankara Law Review, 2008, ( 5 ).
  • 10Luiz Costa. A Brief Analysis of Data Protection Law in Brazil [ Z ]. 28th Plenary meeting of the Consuhative Committee of the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data [ETS No. 108 ] ( T-PD ), Council of Europe, June, 2012, ( 9 ).

共引文献85

同被引文献48

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部