期刊文献+

中文版护生核心能力量表的信效度检验 被引量:44

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the competency inventory for nursing students
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 评价中文版护生核心能力量表(CINS)信、效度.方法 采用经Brislin法翻译并修订的中文版CINS,对266名护理本科生进行调查,运用SPSS17.0进行统计分析.结果 中文版CINS总量表的Cronbachs'α系数为0.966,各维度Cronbachs'α系数为0.827~0.951,Guttman分半信度为0.828,各维度Guttman分半系数为0.724~0.942,重测信度为0.737,内容效度为0.956,量表各维度间的相关系数为0.491~0.781(P<0.01),各维度与总量表之间的相关系数值为0.738~ 0.884(P<0.01).探索性因子分析抽取5个因子,累计解释的总方差为66.404%.结论 中文版CINS具有较高的信、效度,可用于护生核心能力的评估. Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of Chinese version of the competency inventory for nursing students(CINS).Methods The competency inventory for nursing students was translated and revised in Chinese version.Totally,266 baccalaureate nursing students were tested by the Chinese version CINS.SPSS17.0 was used to test the reliability and validity.Results The Cronbach' s α of CINS was 0.966 and Cronbach' sα of each dimensionality was ranged from 0.827 to 0.951.The Split-half reliability of Guttman of CINS was 0.828 and Split-half reliability of Guttman of each dimensionality was ranged from 0.724 to 0.942.The test-retest reliability was 0.737 and the content validity was 0.956.The correlation coefficients among dimensionalities were ranged from 0.491 to 0.781 (P<0.01).The correlation coefficients between dimensionalities and the total scale were ranged from 0.738 to 0.884(P<0.01).Five factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis,accounting for 66.404% of the total variance in the scale.Conclusion Chinese version of CINS is reliable and valid,and can be used to assess the competency of nursing students.
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第2期172-174,共3页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 天津市教育科学“十二五”规划课题(HE4031),天津中医药大学大学生创新基金
关键词 护生 核心能力 信度 效度 Nursing students Competency Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Alexander MF, Runciman PlICN framework of competencies for the generalist nurse: report of the development process and consultation[J] . Geneva : International Council of Nurses ,2003: 1-51.
  • 2曹梅娟,姜安丽.护理本科人才培养整体胜任力标准框架模型的构建[J].中华护理杂志,2009,44(6):536-538. 被引量:143
  • 3Numminen 0, Meretoja R, Isoaho H, et al. Professional competence of practising nurses[J] .J Clin Nurs ,2013 ,22( 9-10) : 1411-1123.
  • 4吴英,任辉.护理本科生核心能力研究现状及进展[J].全科护理,2010,8(32):2992-2994. 被引量:28
  • 5Hsu LL, Hsieh S1. Development and psychometric evaluation of the competency inventory for nursing students: A learning outcome per?spective[J].Nurse Educ Today,2013,33(5) :492-497.
  • 6史静琤,莫显昆,孙振球.量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2012,37(2):152-155. 被引量:1049
  • 7Vahedi S, F arrokhi F, Mahdavi A, et al. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the career decision-making difficulties questionnaire[J].IranJ Psychiatry,2012(2) ,7:74-81.
  • 8王丽,李乐之.中文版护理工作环境量表的信效度研究[J].中华护理杂志,2011,46(2):121-123. 被引量:165
  • 9Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: principle and methods. seventh e?dition[J] . Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003 : 423.
  • 10Portney LG, Waltk ins MP . Foundation of clinical research : application to practice[M] .2nd ed.NewJersey: Pretice-Hall ,2002: 142-145.

二级参考文献94

共引文献1466

同被引文献435

引证文献44

二级引证文献216

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部