期刊文献+

腰椎后路融合手术473例围手术期并发症分析 被引量:3

The analysis on the perioperative complications of posterior lumbar fusion surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨分析腰椎后路融合手术围手术期并发症的特点及治疗。方法回顾性研究2010-01~2012-12在该院接受腰椎后路融合手术患者473例,分析其围手术期并发症的特点及治疗。结果473例患者中围手术期出现并发症56例60例次(12.68%),其中神经根刺激症状16例,伤口感染10例,脑脊液漏8例,泌尿系统疾病7例,消化系统疾病6例,血液系统疾病5例,心肺系统疾病8例,所有并发症经对症处理后好转出院。结论腰椎后路融合手术围手术期并发症的发生严重影响了手术疗效及患者的满意度,因此除了严格掌握手术适应证及手术操作外,围手术期间有针对性的预防更有利于减少并发症的发生。 Objective To analyse the characteristics and treatment for perioperative complications of posteri -or lumbar fusion surgery .Methods From January 2010 to December 2012 , 473 patients underwent posterior lumbar fusion surgery in our hospital , and the characteristics and treatment of perioperative complications were analysed ret -rospectively.Results Of 473 patients, 60 complications during the perioperative period occurred in 56 cases ( ac-counted for 12.68%) , including nerve root irritation ( 16 cases ) , incision infection ( 10 cases ) , cerebrospinal fluid leakages(8 cases), urinary system diseases(7 cases), digestive system diseases(6 cases), hematologic system dis-eases(5 cases), cardiopulmonary system diseases (8 cases).And the complications were improved after symptomatic treatment .Conclusion Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar fusion surgery may seriously affect the clinical result of the surgery and patients′satisfactions .So besides the surgical indications and skilled technique , the targeted prevention during the perioperative period in advance is more advantageous to reduce the occurrence of complications .
出处 《中国临床新医学》 2014年第3期215-219,共5页 CHINESE JOURNAL OF NEW CLINICAL MEDICINE
关键词 腰椎后路融合手术 感染 手术并发症 围手术期 Posterior lumbar fusion surgery Infection Surgical complications Perioperative period
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1黎华,李荣祝,韦建勋,丘德赞,梁斌,尹东,韦敏克.Quadrant微创系统治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床疗效观察[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2012,20(24):2217-2221. 被引量:14
  • 2肖波,毛克亚,王岩,肖嵩华,张永刚,张西峰,张雪松,王征,崔庚,陆宁,朱守荣,薛超.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术与传统后路腰椎椎体间融合术并发症的比较分析[J].脊柱外科杂志,2013,11(1):23-27. 被引量:69
  • 3Lee KH, Yue WM, Yeo W, et al. Clinical and radiolagical outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fu- sion[J]. Eur Spine J,2012,21 ( 11 ) :2265 -2270.
  • 4Rodriguez-Vela J, Lobo-Escolar A, Joven E, et al. Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive versus open approach for one-level transforami- hal lumbar interbody fusion at the 3- to 4-year follow-up [ J ]. Eur Spine J,2013,22(12) :2857 -2863.
  • 5Kepler CK, Hilibrand AS. Management of adjacent segment disease af- ter cervical spinal fusion [ J ]. Orthop Clin North Am ,2012,43 (1) :53 -62.
  • 6Kant AP, Daum WJ, Dean SM, et al. Evaluation of lumbar spine fu- sion : plain radiographs versus direct surgical exploration and observa- tion[ J ]. Spine( PhiIa Pa 1976), 1995,20(21 ) :2313 - 2317.
  • 7Lee MJ, Konodi MA, Cizik AM, et al. Risk factors for medical com- plication after spine surgery: a multivariate analysis of 1,591 patients [J]. Spine J,2012,12(3) :197 -206.
  • 8Karikari IO, Isaacs RE. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar in- terbody fusion : a review of techniques and outcomes[ J]. Spine( Phila Pa 1976) ,2010,35(26 Sppul) :S294 -S301.

二级参考文献23

  • 1Kim CW, Siemionow K, Anderson DG,et al. The current state of min- imally invasive spine surgery [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2011,6:582 - 596.
  • 2German JW, Foley KT. Minimal access surgical techniques in the management of the painful lumbar motion segment [ J ]. Spine, 2005, 16:52 -59.
  • 3Kant AP, Daum WJ, Dean SM, et al. Evaluation of lumbar spine fu- sion. Plain radiographs versus direct surgical exploration and obser- vation [ J ]. Spine, 1995,21:2313 - 2317.
  • 4Suwa H, Hanakita J iOhshita N, et al. Postoperative changes in pa- raspinal muscle thickness after various lumbar back surgery proce- dures [ J]. Neurologia Medicochirurgica,2000,3 : 151 - 155.
  • 5Selznick LA, Shamji MF, Isaacs RE. Minimally invasive interbody fu- sion for revision lumbar surgery:technical feasibility and safety[ J]. J Spinal Disord Tech,2009,3 : 207 - 213.
  • 6Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. A histologic and enzymatic analysis [ J ]. Spine, 1996,8:941 - 944.
  • 7Poussa M, Remes V, Lamberg T, et al. Treatment of severe spondylo- listhesis in adolescence with reduction or fusion in situ: long-term clinical, radiologic, and functional outcome[ J]. Spine ,2006,5:583.
  • 8Park Y, Ha JW. Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach [ J ]. Spine,2007,5:537 - 543.
  • 9Chrastil J, Patel AA. Complications associated with posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion [ J ]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2012, 20(5) :283-291.
  • 10Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Oda T, et al. Surgical complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with total facetectomy in 251 patients[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2006, 4(4) :304-309.

共引文献80

同被引文献15

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部