期刊文献+

PPP项目中初始信任形成机理的实证研究 被引量:43

An empirical study about formation mechanism of initial trust in PPP projects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过理论分析将PPP项目中的信任划分为资格预审中形成的静态的初始信任和合同谈判与再谈判过程中动态演化的持续性信任,通过文献分析构建PPP项目中初始信任形成机理的概念模型,并运用结构方程模型的方法进行实证分析。研究结果表明:①管理能力、力量投入、社会声誉、财务状况、安全和环境能力、技术能力是PPP项目中初始信任的关键驱动因素;②过往表现和工程经验间接促成初始信任的形成;③初始信任的3个维度对其总体水平的贡献度相差不大。该研究成果可帮助公共部门优化PPP项目资格预审评审指标和评审标准,从而促使项目成功。 Trust in PPP project is divided into the static initial trust formed in the prequalification and the dynamic continuous trust in the negotiation and renegotiation based on theoretical analysis. A conceptual model about the formation mechanism of initial trust in PPP project is first developed by a thorough literature review, and then tested by structural equation modeling. The main results are as follows: ① managerial competence, devotion, reputation, financial status, competence of security and sustainable development, technical competence are identified to be the key driving factors of initial trust in PPP projects ; ②performance in the past and experience affect the initial trust indirectly ; ③ there is no significant difference among the contribution degrees of initial trust' s three dimensions to its whole level. The research results can help the public sectors improve the review index and criteria of PPP project prequalification, and thus contribute to project success.
作者 杜亚灵 闫鹏
出处 《土木工程学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期115-124,共10页 China Civil Engineering Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金(71002066 71372110)
关键词 PPP项目 初始信任 项目治理 资格预审 结构方程模型 PPP project initial trust project governance prequalification structural equation modeling (SEM)
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Yeo K T, Tiong R L. Positive management of differences for risk reduction in BOT projects [ J ]. International Journal of Project Management, 2000,18 (4) :257-265.
  • 2孙慧,孙晓鹏,范志清.PPP项目的再谈判比较分析及启示[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2011,13(4):294-297. 被引量:27
  • 3刘家锋.工程项目伙伴关系模式的信任增长模型[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2011,8(2):108-113. 被引量:4
  • 4Atkinson R, Crawford L, Ward S. Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management [ J ]. International Journal of Project Management, 2006,24 ( 8 ) : 687-698.
  • 5Poppo L, Zenger T. Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 2002,23 (8) :707-725.
  • 6Dyer J H, Chu W. The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea [ J]. Organization Science, 2003,14( 1 ) :57-68.
  • 7叶瑛,姜彦福.创业投资机构的信任影响新创企业绩效的跨案例研究[J].管理世界,2009,25(10):152-163. 被引量:28
  • 8宝贡敏,鞠芳辉.信任、控制与合伙企业成长危机——基于企业家人力资本与心理所有权的解释[J].科研管理,2007,28(2):43-52. 被引量:12
  • 9Laan A, Voordijk H, Noorderhaven N, et al. Levels of interorganizational trust in construction projects: empirical evidence [ J ]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2011,138 (7) :821-831.
  • 10Faems D, Janssens M, Madhok A, et al. Toward an integrative perspective on alliance governance: connecting contract design, trust dynamics, and contract application [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 2008,51 ( 6 ) : 1053-1078.

二级参考文献157

共引文献197

同被引文献385

引证文献43

二级引证文献265

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部