期刊文献+

2012年美国BIT范本中劳工条款的新发展与中国对策研究——以投资利益与劳工保护平衡为视角 被引量:2

Recent Developments in Investment and Labor Clause of 2012 U.S. Model BIT and China's Countermeasures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当今世界,投资利益与劳工保护的冲突与协调,已成为经济全球化和国际投资自由化进程中的重大议题。作为美国BIT"示范法"的最新发展,2012年美国BIT范本对投资与劳工条款的修订不仅可能对中美BIT谈判产生重大影响,更可能通过最惠国待遇条款的"传导"效应,进而成为未来国际投资法革新的重要推动力。本文对2012年美国BIT范本中的投资与劳工条款进行深入研究,结合美国、中国以往的BIT缔约实践和国际投资争端解决实践,强调应明确BIT定位,在BIT中"有限"纳入投资与劳工问题,以期对中国更好地平衡投资利益与劳工保护有所贡献。 In the contemporary world,conflict and coordination between investors'interests and labors'protection have become one of the most significant issues in the process of globalization and international investment.As the recent development of the U.S.Model BIT,2012 U.S.Model BIT demonstrates changes in terms of investment and labor which may not only have substantial impacts on Sino-U.S.BIT negotiation,but also become an importance impetus for future innovation of international investment law through the MFN clause.This article,by conducting an in-depth research on investment and labor clause in2012 U.S.Model BIT and combining the U.S.BIT practice,China's BIT practice,as well as the international investment dispute settlement practice,suggests that China should determine her standpoint in negotiating BIT and adopt provisions related to investment and labor in order to make contributions in balancing investors'interests and labors'interests.
作者 梁咏
机构地区 复旦大学法学院
出处 《上海商学院学报》 2013年第4期14-23,共10页 Business Economic Review
基金 教育部社科青年项目"双边投资条约与中国海外能源投资保障研究"(10YJC820065) 国家社科项目"气候变化下中国海外能源投资法律保护"(10CFX099) 商务部和上海市部市决策咨询研究项目"我国参与双边和多边投资规则制定和谈判的策略研究"的资助
关键词 投资与劳工 美国BIT范本 劳工保护 investment and labor U.S.model BIT labors'interests
  • 相关文献

参考文献57

  • 1UNCTAD ( United Nations Conference Trade and Development): Bilateral Investment Treaties in the Mid- 1990s, United Nations, 1998.
  • 2UNCTAD: World Investment Report 2007, United Nations, 2007.
  • 3余劲松.国际投资条约仲裁中投资者与东道国权益保护平衡问题研究[J].中国法学,2011(2):132-143. 被引量:170
  • 4《世界人权公约》第23条.
  • 5《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》第22.1条.
  • 6UNCTAD, Employment. UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements. United Nations, 2000, pp. 3, 15 - 33.
  • 7Jose Alvarez. Critical Theory and the North American Free Trade Agreement's Chapter Eleven. The University of Miami Inter American Law Review, Vol. 28, 1997, pp. 303, 308.
  • 8R. E. I.ipsey. Outward Direct Investment and the US Economy. NBER Working Paper, No. 4691.
  • 9罗伯特·基欧汉,约瑟夫·奈著.门洪华译.权力与相互依赖(第三版).北京大学出版社,2002:263.
  • 10王彦志.经济全球化、可持续发展与国际投资法第三波.国际经济法学刊.北京大学出版社2006年版,第180页.

二级参考文献79

  • 1刘小明.跨国公司在华环境污染问题探析[J].山东干部函授大学学报,2008(2):42-43. 被引量:5
  • 2余劲松.外资的公平与公正待遇问题研究——由NAFTA的实践产生的几点思考[J].法商研究,2005,22(6):41-48. 被引量:39
  • 3何志鹏.人的回归:个人国际法上地位之审视[J].法学评论,2006,24(3):56-63. 被引量:25
  • 4余劲松,詹晓宁.国际投资协定的近期发展及对中国的影响[J].法学家,2006(3):154-160. 被引量:21
  • 5LG&E Energy Corp. et al. v The Republic of Argentina. ICSID ease no. ARB/02/1 (2006) ;Continental Casualty Company v The Argentine Republic. ICSID case no. ARB/O3/gA, award of 5 September 2008.
  • 6See Anthea Roberts, Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States, 104 Am. J. Int' l. L. 179 (2010).
  • 7See William W. Burke -White & Andreas yon Stadan, Investment Protection in Extraordinary Time: The Interpretation and Application of Nort - Precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties, 48 Va. J. Int' l L. (2008) 307, 376 - 81.
  • 8Id., 320-324,.
  • 9CMS Gas Transmission Company v The Argentine Republic, ICSID case no. ARB/01/08, 12) (annulment proceeding). Decision of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic, 25 September 2007, para. 128 - 136.
  • 10Sempra Energy International v The Argentine Republic. ICSID case no. ARB/02/16 ( Annulment Proceeding), Decision on the Argentine Re- public' s Request for Annulment of the Award, 29 June 2010.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部