期刊文献+

影响急性心肌梗塞患者院前延迟时间的因素 被引量:18

Factors Associated with Prehospital Delay Time in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨影响急性心肌梗塞(AMI)患者院前延迟时问(PDI)的相关因素。 方法:收集461例 AMI患者,剔除47例资料不全者,将入选 414例分为 PDT≤6h组 221例,PDT>6 h组 193例。分析包括性别、年龄、高血压史、糖尿病史、高血脂、吸烟史、既往心绞痛史、发病时间、主要症状、PDT,入院时心功能、梗塞部位等。 结果;①PDT>6h组较PDT≤6h组年龄大、女性患者比例高、糖尿病史者比例高、既往有心绞痛史者多、夜间发病者比例高,2组比均有显著性差异,P<0.05~0.01。但典型胸痛症状和入院时心功能不全PDT>6h组较 PDT≤6h组比率低,组均有显著性差异,P<0.05~0.01;②多元逻辑回归分析显示年龄、糖尿病史、既往心绞痛病史、发病时间及入院时心功能不全为影响PDT的独立相关因素。 结论:年龄、糖尿病史、心绞痛病史、发病时间及入院时心功能不全为影响AMI患者PDT的独立相关因素。 Objective:To determine the factors ass ociated with prehospital delay time(PDT)in patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI) Methods:Dat of sex,age,history of hype rtension,diabetes,hypercholesterolemia and smoking,previous angina,symptom onset time,main symptoms,PDT,and heart function on admission were obtained from 461 A MI patients Results:①There were much difference be tween patients with PDT>6h and patients with PDT≤6h in age(64.2±10.9 vs.59.1 ±11.1,p<0.01),rate of female(30.6% vs.21.7%,p<0 .05),diabetes history(17.6% vs. 8.6%,p<0.01),angina his tory(72.5% vs.54.3%,p<0.1),nocturnal attacks(35.8% vs. 1.3%,p<0.01),typical angina(37.8% vs.64.7%,p<0.01)and heart insufficiency(24. 4% vs.33.9%,p<0.05);②Multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that age(OR 1.40,95% CI 1.19-1.65),diabetes(OR 1.31,95% CI 1.21-1.42),history of angina( OR 1.39,95% CI 1.30-1.48),symptom onset time(OR 1.37,95% CI 1.06-1.54) and heart insufficiency on admission(OR 1.58,95% CI 0.89-2.83)were the independent factors associated with PDT Conclusion:Age,diabetic or angina hist ory,symptom onset time and heart insuffi ciency on admission are the independent factors associated with PDT in patients with AMI.
出处 《中国循环杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2001年第4期272-274,共3页 Chinese Circulation Journal
关键词 急性心肌梗塞 延迟时间 PDT Acute myocardial infarction Delay time Factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1[1]The Uninted Kingdom Heart Attack Study Collaborative Group. Effect of time from onset to coming under care on fatality of patients with acute myocardial infarction: effect of resuscitation and thrombolytic therapy. Heart, 1998, 80: 121-126.
  • 2[2]Norris RM, on behalf of The United Kingdom Heart Attack Study Collaborative Group. Fatality outside hospital from acute coronary events in three British health districts: 1994-95. BMJ, 1998, 316:1065-1070.
  • 3[3]Rawles JM. Quantification of the benefit of earlier thrombolytic therapy: five years results of the Grampian region early anistreplase trail (GREAT). J AmCollCardiol, 1997, 30: 1181-1186.
  • 4[4]Berger AK, Radford MJ, Krumholz HM. Factors associated with delay in reperfusion therapy in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: Analysis of the cooperative cardiovascular project. Am Heart J, 2000, 139: 985-992.
  • 5[5]Weaver WD, White HD, Wilcox RG, et al. Comparisons of characteristics and outcomes among women and men with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy. GUSTO-1 Investigators.JAMA, 1996, 275: 777-782.
  • 6[6]Malacrida R, Genoni M, Maggioni AP, et al. A comparison of the early outcome of acute myocardial infarction in women and men. The Third International study of infarct survival Collaborative Group. N EnglJ Med, 1998, 338: 8-14.
  • 7[7]Dracup K, Moser DK, Eisenberg M, et al. Causes of delay in seeking treatment for heart attack symptoms. Soc Sci Med, 1995, 40:379-392.
  • 8[8]Leslie WS, Urie A, Hooper J, et al. Delay in calling for help during myocardial infarction: reasons for the delay and subsequent pattern of accessing care. Heart, 2000, 84: 137-141.

同被引文献116

引证文献18

二级引证文献99

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部