期刊文献+

超声引导下肋间神经阻滞联合全麻对乳腺癌手术的麻醉效果及术后镇痛的影响 被引量:11

Effects of anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block combined with general anesthesia for breast cancer surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察超声引导下肋间神经阻滞联合全麻对乳腺癌改良根治术麻醉效果及术后镇痛的影响。方法择期行乳腺癌改良根治术的患者60例,ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级,随机分为A组和B组,每组30例。A组全麻诱导前先行患侧超声引导下的肋间神经阻滞,B组直接行全麻诱导。术中根据BIS、血压及心率调节全麻药的泵注速度,手术结束时记录丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼的用量及全麻后患者的苏醒时间。患者的术后镇痛A组采用超声引导下的肋间神经阻滞,B组应用静脉泵术后镇痛,观察术后2 h、4 h、8 h、12 h、24 h的镇痛效果、镇静程度及术后并发症的情况。结果 A组与B组相比丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼的用量明显减少以及苏醒时间明显缩短,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01或P〈0.05)。A组术后2、4 h的VAS评分与B组比较明显降低,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),8 h、12 h、24 h的VAS评分相比差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。A组术后2 h、4 h、8 h、12 h、24 h的镇静评分与B组相比降低,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。A组患者仅有2例发生恶心呕吐,未发生皮肤瘙痒、穿刺部位血肿、气胸等不良反应和并发症;B组有9例发生恶心呕吐,6例发生皮肤瘙痒,与A组发生率相比差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论超声引导下肋间神经阻滞可增强全麻的麻醉效果,减少麻醉药的用量,延长术后镇痛时效。 Objective To observe the analgesic effect, adverse reaction and the postoperative analgesic action of ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block combined with general anesthesia and total intravenous anesthesia in modified radical mastectomy. Methods 40 patients undergoing elective modified radical mastectomy, ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ grade, were randomly divided into group A and group B, 20 patients in each: general anesthesia + ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block group(group A), total intravenous anesthesia group(group B). According to BIS, blood pressure and heart rate regulate pumping speed anesthetics, group A took firstly ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block before induction of anesthesia, group B took directly induction of general anesthesia. To record the entirely perioperative propofol and remifentanil drug amount as well as patient'awake time after stopping anesthetics. Group A used ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block and group B used intravenous pumps on postoperative analgesia, to observe postoperative analgesia and complications of 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 h. Results Propofol and remifentanil dosage of group A significantly reduced and the wake-up time was significantly shorter comparing with group B, and the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.01 or P〈0.05). VAS scores of group A significantly reduced at postoperative 2 h and 4 h comparing with group B, the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05), there were no difference in VAS scores of 8 h, 12 h, 24 h(P〉0.05). Sedation score of group A reduced at postoperative 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h and 24 h comparing with group B, the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). The patients of group A with only two case of nausea and vomiting did not occur itchy skin, puncture site hematoma and pneumothorax; The patients of group B had nine cases of nausea and vomiting and six cases of skin itching, the difference was statistically significant comparing with the incidence of group A(P〈0.05). Conclusion Ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block anesthesia can enhance the effect of reducing the amount of anesthetic and prolong the duration of postoperative analgesia.
出处 《中华临床医师杂志(电子版)》 CAS 2014年第11期53-56,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition)
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 麻醉和镇痛 超声检查 肋间神经 Breast neoplasms Anesthesia and analgesia Ultrasonography Intercostal nerves
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1梁力建,林建华,廖斌.外科学[M].5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:104-105
  • 2徐启明.临床麻醉学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:305-310.
  • 3左美娟,张博.肋间神经阻滞联合全麻用于乳癌根治术[J].中国医学创新,2010,7(26):83-84. 被引量:3
  • 4Vermeylen K,Engelen S,Sermeus L,et al.Supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks:review and current practice[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Belg,2012,63(1):15-21.
  • 5Bruce BG,Green A,Blaine TA,et al.Brachial plexus blocks for upper extremity orthopaedic surgery[J].J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2012,20(1):38-47.
  • 6田玉科,梅伟.超声定位神经阻滞图谱[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:175.
  • 7Cornish PB.Bilateral brachial plexus blocks:some other issues to consider[J].Anaesth Intensive Care,2010,38(4):771,author reply771-772.
  • 8Misamore G,Webb B,McMurray S,et al.A prospective analysis of interscalene brachial plexus blocks performed under general anesthesia[J].J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2011,20(2):308-314.
  • 9林海,王权光,张慧玲,刘乐,皮治兵,徐旭仲.超声引导后路肋间神经阻滞对带状疱疹性神经痛患者的疗效[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2011,31(1):47-49. 被引量:10
  • 10Tran de QH,Russo G,Mu?oz L,et al.A prospective,randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided supraclavicular,infraclavicular,and axillary brachial plexus blocks[J].Reg Anesth Pain Med,2009,34(4):366-371.

二级参考文献22

共引文献43

同被引文献93

引证文献11

二级引证文献96

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部