摘要
目的:观察不同剂量氨溴索治疗糖尿病合并社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的临床疗效和安全性。方法:70例糖尿病合并CAP患者按随机数字表法均分为常规剂量组和双倍剂量组。两组患者均给予口服降糖药、肌肉注射胰岛素等常规治疗。在此基础上,常规剂量组患者给予氨溴索口服液10 ml,bid+盐酸莫西沙星0.4 g加入0.9%氯化钠注射液250 ml中静脉滴注,qd;双倍剂量组患者给予氨溴索口服液20 ml,bid+盐酸莫西沙星(用法用量同常规剂量组)。两组患者疗程均为7 d。观察两组患者的临床疗效、治疗前后临床症状总评分、血糖变化及不良反应发生情况。结果:双倍剂量组患者总有效率显著高于常规剂量组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前两组患者临床症状总评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后两组患者临床症状总评分显著低于同组治疗前,且双倍剂量组低于常规剂量组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者治疗前后血糖、不良反应发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:双倍剂量氨溴索治疗糖尿病合并CAP的疗效显著优于常规剂量,安全性较好。
OBJECTIVE: To observe clinical efficacy and safety of different dose of ambroxol in the treatment of diabetes com- plicating with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: 70 patients with diabetes complicating with CAP were random- ly divided into routine dose group and double dose group. Both groups were given hypoglycemic drugs orally, intramuscular injec- tion of insulin and other routine treatment. Routine dose group was additionally given Ambroxol oral solution 10 ml, bid, moxiflox- acin hydrochloride 0.4 g added into 0.9% Sodium chloride injection 250 ml, i.v., qd. Double dose group additionally received Am- broxol oral solution 20 ml, bid, moxifloxacin hydrochloride (same usage and dosage as routine dose group). Treatment course of 2 groups lasted for 7 d. Clinical efficacies of 2 groups were observed, and total symptom score, blood glucose and ADR were also observed before and after treatment. RESULTS: Total effective rate of double dose group was significantly higher than that of rou- tine dose group; there was statistical significance (P〈0.05). Total symptom score of 2 groups had no statistical significance before treatment (P〉0.05). Total symptom scores of 2 groups after treatment were significantly lower than before; the double dose group was lower than the routine dose group; there was statistical significance (P〈0.05). There was no statistical significance in blood glucose and the incidence of ADR in 2 groups before and after treatment (P〉0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic efficacy of dou- ble dose of ambroxol is significantly better than routine dose in the treatment of diabetes complicating with CAP and also has better safety.
出处
《中国药房》
CAS
CSCD
2014年第40期3772-3774,共3页
China Pharmacy