期刊文献+

5~6岁幼儿自我概念图片量表的编制 被引量:4

Development of the Pictorial Scale of Self-Concept for Kindergarten Children Aged 5-6
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为编制5~6岁幼儿自我概念图片量表,本研究采用WAI(WhoAmI)技术,对19名5~6岁幼儿进行了一对一的开放式访谈;采用自编《5~6岁幼儿自我概念图片量表》对107名5-6岁幼儿进行预测,通过项目分析、验证性因素分析、信度分析对量表的内部一致性信度、分半信度和构想效度进行检验;采用经预测考证后的《5—6岁幼儿自我概念图片量表》对339名5—6幼儿正式施测(3个月后又对其中的50名幼儿进行了重测),同时采用《4~7岁儿童社会化量表》对143名幼儿家长进行测试。通过相关分析等方法对量表的重测信度和校标关联效度进行分析,采用验证性因素分析再次对量表的结构效度进行分析。结果表明:(1)验证性因子分析显示,5~6岁幼儿的自我概念由学业能力、同伴关系、生活习惯、服从性和家庭关系五个维度构成,量表的结构效度良好且具有跨样本的稳定性;(2)量表各维度及总量表的内部一致性信度与重测信度均在O.60以上,量表各维度得分及量表总分与《4。7岁儿童社会化发展量表》中自我概念维度的相关系数介于0.41-0.59,均达到0.05水平或以上显著。这表明本研究编制的《5—6岁幼儿自我概念图片量表》具有良好的心理测量学特性,可供今后同类研究使用。 To develop a pictorial scale that can measure 5-6 years old kindergarten children's self- concept, the study adopted the technology of WAI (Who Am I), and one to one open-ended interviews with 19 kindergarten children aged 5-6. 107 kindergarten children aged 5-6 were administrated to finished the pretest of the self-developed Pictorial Scale of Self-Concept for Kindergarten Children Aged 5-6, Of which internal consistency reliability, split-half reliability and construct validity had been analyzed through item analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and reliability analysis. 339 kindergarten children aged 5-6 completed the formal test (fifty of them were retested three month later), and 143 parents of those children finished the Children's Social Development Scale for Children Aged 4-7. It could be concluded that the Pictorial Scale of Self-Concept for Kindergarten Children Aged 5-6 developed has good reliability and validity, and can be used for further studies in this field.
作者 刘旺 田丽丽
出处 《学前教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期43-52,共10页 Studies in Early Childhood Education
基金 广东省普通高校人文社会科学研究重点研究基地项目(编号:11JDXM19001)
关键词 5~6岁幼儿 自我概念 图片量表 kindergarten children aged 5-6, self-concept, pictorial scale
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Marsh H W, Craven R G, Debus R L. Self-concepts of young children aged 5 to 8: Their mea- surement and multidimensional structure[J]. Journal of Educational Psychology,1991,83:377-392.
  • 2Marsh H W, Ellis L A, Craven R G. How Do Preschool Children Feel About Themselves? Unrav- eling Measurement and Multidimensional Self-Concept Structure [J].Developmental Psychology,2002,38(3): 376-393.
  • 3Shavelson R J, Hubner J J, Stanton G C. Self-Concept: Validation of Construct lnterpretations [J ]. Review of Educational Research, 1976,46(3):407-441.
  • 4Harter S, Pike R. The Pictorial Scale of Perceived Competence and Social Acceptance for Young Children[J].Child Development, 1984,55(6): 1969-1982.
  • 5杨莉君,康丹.2~3岁幼儿自我概念教师评定量表的编制[J].湖南师范大学教育科学学报,2004,3(2):103-107. 被引量:2
  • 6Wang,Q. Relations of Maternal Style and Child Self-Concept to Autobiographical Memories in Chi- nese, Chinese Immigrant, and European American 3-Year-Olds[J].Child Development,2006,77(6):1794-1809.
  • 7何友晖,黄莎莎,吴兆文,何天虹,汪惠兰,张小东.儒家文化对认知发展的影响[J].教学研究,2005,28(5):381-388. 被引量:4
  • 8Harter S. The Perceived Competence Scale for Children[J].Child Development,1982,53(1):87-97.
  • 9Keller A, Ford L H, Meacham J A. Dimensions of self-concept in preschool children[J].Develop- mental Psychology, 1978,14(5):483-489.
  • 10Measelle J R, Ablow J C, Cowan P A, et al. Assessing Young Children's Views of Their Aca- demic, Social and Emotional Lives: An Evaluation of the Self-Perception Scales of the Berkeley Puppet Interview[J].Child Development, 1998,69(6): 1556-1576.

二级参考文献56

  • 1[1]詹姆士.心理学简编[M].北京:商务印书馆,1930.
  • 2[2]钟启泉.美国教学流派[M].西安:陕西人民教育出版社,1993.
  • 3[3]Engtson V L, Reedy M N, Gordon C.Aging and self-conceptions: Personality processes and social contexts. In Barren JE, Schaie KW eds. Hanbdook of the psychology of aging (2nd side)[M]. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1985.
  • 4[4]伯恩斯.自我概念的发展与教育[M].北京:北京教育出版社,1999.
  • 5[5]何立婴.教学社会心理学[M].石家庄:河北教育出版社,1999.
  • 6[6]金盛华.教育心理学进展:专题论文与课题[M].武汉:湖北教育出版社,2001.
  • 7[7][英]朱莉娅, 贝里曼.发展心理学与你(陈萍等译)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2001.
  • 8Bandalos D L, Finney S J. Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 2001. 269-296.
  • 9Bagozzi R P, Edwards J R. A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research.Organizational Research Methods, 1998, 1: 45-87.
  • 10Little T D, Lindenberger U, Nesselroade J R. On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: When “good”indicators are bad and “bad”indicators are good. Psychological Methods, 1999, 4:192-211.

共引文献204

同被引文献157

引证文献4

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部