摘要
目的 比较高危型人乳头瘤病毒(HR-HPV) E6/E7 mRNA与HR-HPV DNA检测(HC-2、Cervista)方法在宫颈病变中的诊断性能,探讨其在宫颈病变筛查中的作用及意义.方法 选取201 1年10月至2012年12月就诊于解放军总医院妇产科172例妇女,分别做宫颈脱落细胞的液基细胞学检查(TCT)、HC-2、Cervista、HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA检测,阴道镜检查及宫颈活体组织检查,以组织学证实的高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)Ⅱ或更高(Ⅱ+)为研究终点.结果 HR-HPV E6/E7mRNA阳性率在未见上皮内病变或恶性(NILM)中为37.9%,在意义不明的非典型鳞状细胞(ASCUS)和低度鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL)中为67.9%(36/53),在非典型鳞状细胞不能排除高度鳞状上皮内病变(ASC-H+)中为88.5% (54/61).HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA阳性率在CIN I-中为38.6%,在CINⅡ~Ⅲ为77.4%,在SCC中为92.5%.在CINⅡ+人群中HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA检测特异度明显高于HC-2、Cervista(61.4%和54.3%,55.7%,P<0.05),并具有更高的阳性预测值(75.9%、74.8%及74.6%).比较HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA、HC-2和Cervista的ROC曲线,HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA曲线下面积最大,诊断效能最佳.结论 HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA检测在宫颈病变筛查中比HC-2和Cervista检测具有更高特异性,为预测宫颈病变进展及宫颈癌筛查分流提供了新思路.
Objective To determine the performance of HR-HPV E6/E7 massager RNA (mRNA) test for detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in cervical cancer screening and compare the clinical performance of HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA test with HC-2 and Cervista HPV DNA tests for cross-sectional positivity in women with and without cervical neoplasia.Methods A total of 172 women underwent cytology,HR-HPV DNA test,HR-HPV E6/7 mRNA test,colposcopy and biopsy.We compared the clinical performance of HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA test with Hybrid Capture 2 DNA test (HC-2) and Cervista HR-HPV DNA test on the cervical brush specimens during colposcopy and routine screening.The samples were histologically confirmed high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN Ⅱ) or worse (CIN Ⅱ +) as an endpoint.Results HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA positive rate was 37.9% in NILM,67.9% in ASCUS and LSIL,88.5% in ASC-H +.HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA positive rate was 38.6% in CIN Ⅰ,77.4% in CIN Ⅱ-3 and 92.5% in SCC.HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA test showed a higher specificity than HC-2 and Cervista HPV DNA tests for high-grade lesions (61.4%,54.3%,55.7%,respectively,P < 0.05) and also a higher positive predictive value (75.9%,74.8%,74.6% respectively).Among three tests,HR-HPV E6/ E7 mRNA had the largest area of ROC curve and the best diagnostic value.Conclusion HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA test has a performance more specific for detecting CIN Ⅱ + with the same sensitivity as HC-2 and Cervista HPV DNA tests.And it may serve as a more specific test for predicting the risk of progression and offer a viable tool for triage during cervical cancer screening.
出处
《中华医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2014年第43期3432-3435,共4页
National Medical Journal of China
关键词
宫颈肿瘤
筛查
人乳头瘤病毒
Uterine cervical neoplasms
Screen
Human papillomavirus