期刊文献+

社会情感财富与研发投资组合:家族治理的影响 被引量:50

Socialemotion wealth and R&D investment portfolio:an empirical study of the impact of family governance
原文传递
导出
摘要 自主创新是重要的国家战略,家族治理是普遍又特殊的治理机制,但我们对这种治理机制对自主创新战略有何影响却所知甚少。研发投资是培育创新能力的最有影响力的因素,不同研发投资类型具有不同的不确定性、专属收益和成本,不同的治理机制从事不同的创新类型。本文考察家族治理如何影响研发投资、研发投资组合和研发投资动力。基于全国性样本数据,本研究发现家族企业的产品研发强度低于非家族企业,但过程研发强度没有显著差异,家族企业过程研发投资占投资组合的比重高于产品研发,规模越大的低开工率家族企业越会提高产品研发投资的强度。这个发现说明了家族企业研发投资的风险规避具有一定的门槛,他们选择风险收益与保持家族社会情感财富的适当组合,具有较高的差绩容忍度。 Self-innovation is an important national strategy,and family governance is an ubiquitous and unique mechanism,but a little is known how the governance mechanism influences the strategy.R&D is the most powerful factor fostering innovative capacity,various types of R&D investments correspond to different uncertainty,appropriate return and cost,and various corporate governance mechanisms conduct different types of innovation.The paper examines how the family governance influences R&D investment,R&D investment portfolio,and investment momentum.The study,based on national sample,found family business invests less in product R&D than non-family business,but the intensity of process R&D is indifferent between the two types of business,as well as the ratio of process R&D in family business exceeds the ratio of product R&D in family business,furthermore,the larger family business facing lower utilization of capacity will increase the intensity of product R&D.The findings indicate family business will be risk avoidance only if risk is beyond some certain threshold,they keep a trade-off between risky gains and preserving SEW,and that they have a fairly high tolerance with bad performance.
作者 吴炳德 陈凌
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第8期1233-1241,共9页 Studies in Science of Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71272172) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(13YJC630163) 教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(10YJA630233)
关键词 家族企业 社会情感财富 产品研发 过程研发 family business SEW product R&D process R&D
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Dosi G. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation [ J]. Journal of Economic Litera- ture, 1955, 1120- 1171.
  • 2Mansfield E. Industrial research and development ex- penditures: Determinants, prospects, and relation to size of firm and inventive output [ J ]. The Journal of Po- litical Economy, 1964, 72(4): 319-340.
  • 3Porta R, Lopez - De - Silanes F, Shleifer A. Corpo- rate ownership around the world [ J]. The journal of fi- nance, 1999, 54(2) : 471 -517.
  • 4陈凌,王昊.家族涉入、政治联系与制度环境——以中国民营企业为例[J].管理世界,2013,29(10):130-141. 被引量:77
  • 5Le Breton - Miller I, Miller D. Commentary: Family firms and the advantage of multitemporality [ J ]. Entre- preneurship Theory and Practice, 2011, 35(6): 1171 - 1177.
  • 6Lumpkin G T, Brigham K H. Long- term orientation and intertemporal choice in family firms [ J]. Entrepre- neurship Theory and Practice, 2011, 35 (6) : 1149 - 1169.
  • 7Chen H L, Hsu W T. Family ownership, board inde- pendence, and r&d investment [ J]. Family Business Review, 2009, 22(4): 347-362.
  • 8Chin C L, Chen Y J, Kleinman G,et al. Corporate own- ership structure and innovation: Evidence from Taiwan electronics industry [ J ]. Journal of Accounting, Audi- ting and Finance, 2009, 24( 1 ) : 145 - 175.
  • 9Chrisman J J, Patel P C. Variations in r&d investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 2012, 55 (4) : 976 - 997.
  • 10De Massis A, Frattini F, Lichtenthaler U. Research on technological innovation in family firms: Present debates and future directions [ J ]. Family Business Review, 2013, 26(1): 10-31.

二级参考文献128

同被引文献727

引证文献50

二级引证文献558

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部