期刊文献+

大别山五针松种内和种间竞争强度 被引量:77

Intraspecific and interspecific competition of Pinus dabeshanesis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对安徽省岳西县大别山五针松群落内的53株对象木及2079株竞争木的调查,运用Hegyi单木竞争模型分析了大别山五针松的种内和种间竞争强度。结果表明,大别山五针松的种内和种间竞争强度分别为17.11%和82.89%,说明竞争主要来自种间。大别山五针松的伴生种较多,种内与主要伴生种间的竞争关系为短柄枹>大别山五针松种内>黄山松>满山红>茅栗>金缕梅>紫茎>四照花>灯台树>鹅耳枥。竞争强度随对象木胸径的增大而减小,当对象木的胸径小于25cm时,所受到的竞争强度较大;当胸径在25cm以上时,竞争强度变化很小,二者符合幂函数关系(CI=AD-B),所得的预测模型能很好的预测大别山五针松种内和种间竞争强度。 In this study, we investigated the intraspecific and interspecific competition of Pinus dabeshanesis (P. dabeshanesis) in Dabieshan Mountains, Yuexi county of Anhui province, using Hegyi individual competitive indices (CI) model. The competition intensity was analysed from the 53 target trees and 2079 competitive trees within the P. dabeshanesis community. The results showed that intraspecific and interspecific competition intensity of P. dabeshanesis accounted for 17. ll% and 82.89% in the total competition intensity, respectively, indicating a remarkable effect of the interspeeific competition. The value of the main competition intensity was laid out in numerical order, i.e., Quercus serrata 〉 P. dabesh, anesis 〉 Pinus taiwanensis 〉 Rhododendron mariesii 〉 Castanea seguinii 〉 Hamamelis mollis 〉 Stewartia sinensis 〉 Dendrobenthamia hupehensis〉Bothrocaryum controversum 〉 Carpinus turczaninowii. Notably, the competition intensity of P. dabeshanesis decreased inversely to diameter of the breast height ( DBH), which showed a stronger competition at DBH of 〈 25 cm and appeared weaker at DBH over 25 cm. The relationship between the whole forest competition intensity and DBH of the target tree followed the power function ( CI= AD-B). In conclusion, this model could effectively predict the intraspecific and interspecific competition of P. dabeshanesis.
出处 《生态学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第2期389-395,共7页 Acta Ecologica Sinica
基金 国家林业公益性行业科研专项(201304314)
关键词 大别山五针松 种内竞争 种间竞争 竞争指数 P. dabeshanesis intraspecific competition interspecific competition competition index
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Weiner J. Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 1990, 5( 11) : 360-364.
  • 2Yokozawa M, Kubota Y, Hara T. Effects of competition mode on spatial pattern dynamics in plant communities. Ecological Modelling, 1998, 106(1): M6.
  • 3Mackenzie A, Ball A, Virdee S. Instant Notes in Ecology. 2nd ed. UK: Bios Scientific Publishers Ltd., 1998.
  • 4孙嘉男,王孝安,郭华,王世雄.黄土高原柴松群落优势乔木树种的竞争关系[J].生态学杂志,2010,29(11):2162-2167. 被引量:19
  • 5Cortini F,Comeau P G. Evaluation of competitive effects of green aider,willow and other tall shrubs on white spruce and lodgepole pine in NorthernAlberta. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008, 255( 1) : 82-91.
  • 6Filipescu C N, Comeau P G. Competitive interactions between aspen and white spruce vary with stand age in boreal mixed woods. Forest Ecology andManagement, 2007, 247(1/3) : 175-184.
  • 7Bella I E. A new competition model for individual trees. Forest Science, 1971,17(3) : 364-372.
  • 8吴巩胜,王政权.水曲柳落叶松人工混交林中树木个体生长的竞争效应模型[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(5):646-650. 被引量:53
  • 9Schoener T W. Field experiments on interspecific competition. The American Naturalist, 1983,122(2) : 240-279.
  • 10张欣,杨淑贞,赵明水,李令键,刘亮,陈小勇.天目山自然保护区柳杉种群种内和种间竞争[J].农村生态环境,2004,20(4):10-14. 被引量:26

二级参考文献206

共引文献406

同被引文献1085

引证文献77

二级引证文献369

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部