期刊文献+

教育评价专业化:加拿大评价人员资格认证方案及其启示 被引量:10

The Canadian Professional Designations Program for Evaluators and Its Implications for China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 评价专业化是近年来西方国家教育评价领域重要的发展趋势,而评价人员专业化是评价专业化的核心特点之一。加拿大评价协会率先于2009年出台了评价人员能力指标,并正式进行评价人员专业资格认证。资格认证方案以评价标准、评价伦理指导原则和能力要求为基础,从教育经历、工作经历、专业能力和专业学习等方面对评价人员进行资格认证,并采用自愿参与、循序渐进的方式推进,其经验为各国所关注。 Evaluation professionalization is an important tendency in educational eval-uation worldwide. In 2009,the Canadian Evaluation Society approved the Competencies forCanadian Evaluation Practice and the Canadian Professional Designations Program for Eval-uators and began to implement PDP. PDP is built on three CES foundations –CES Stan-dards,CES Guideline for Ethical Conduct and CES Competencies for Canadian Practice.The designation is a voluntary system based on education,experience,professional compe-tencies and a commitment to ongoing learning and professional development. CES's experi-ence in PDP has attracted much attention in the field of evaluation.
作者 郭宝仙
出处 《外国教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期64-71,共8页 Studies in Foreign Education
关键词 加拿大 教育评价 评价人员资格认证方案 教育评价专业化 The Canadian Evaluation Society educational evaluation Professional Designations Program for Evaluators professionalization of educational evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1李雁冰.论教育评价专业化[J].教育研究,2013,34(10):121-126. 被引量:70
  • 2李懿芳.加拿大评鉴人员资格认证机制及其对我国教育评鉴专业化之启示[J].教育政策论坛,2012,(4):1-21.
  • 3Linda G. Morra Imas. The Movement for Global Competencies for Development Evaluators [EB/OL]. [2014-10-09].http ://www.Ideas-int.org/documents/document.cfm?doclD=417.
  • 4Canadian Evaluation Society. What is the Canadian Evaluation Society? [EB/OL]. [2014-10- 09 ]. http://www.evaluationcanada.ca/txt/ces_brochure_e.pdf.
  • 5Canadian Evaluation Society. Professional Designations Program Appli- cant Guide [EB/OL]. [2014-10-09]. https ://www.cesprofessional designation ca/CES/FileDownloadHan- dler?type-:le&name=pdpApplGuideEng.
  • 6Canadian Evaluation Society. Evaluation of the Canadian Evaluation Society Professional Desig- nation Program [ EB/OL ]. [ 2013-03-28 ]. http://competition.evaluation canada.ca/txt/201 Or 1 en.pdf.
  • 7The Canadian/US Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. Program Evaluation Standards Statements [ EB/OL]. [ 2014- 10- 09 ]. http://www.jcsee.org/program- Evaluation- standards- statements.
  • 8The Canadian Evaluation Society. Guideline for Ethical Conduct [EB/oL]. [2014-10-09]. http://www.evaluationcanada.ca/site.cgi?section=5&ssection=4&_lang=an.
  • 9The Canadian Evaluation Society.Credentialed Evaluators [EB/OL]. [2014-10-09]. http:// www.evaluationcanada.ca/site.cgi?s=5&ss= 12&_lang=EN.
  • 10蔡敏.关于教育评价专业化的探讨[J].高等师范教育研究,2002,14(3):34-38. 被引量:8

二级参考文献16

  • 1House, E. R.(1993). Professional evaluation: Social impact and political consequences. Newbury Park,CA :SAGE Publications ,Inc.
  • 2Berk, R. A. , Rossi, P. H. (1999). Thinking abcut Program evaluation. Thousand Oaks,CA :SAGE Publications ,Inc.
  • 3王汉澜.教育评价学[M].石家庄:河北教育出版社,1996..
  • 4侯光文.教育评价概论[M].开封:河南大学出版社.1995.
  • 5Worthen, B. R. , &.Sanders, J. R. (1987).Educational evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. White Plains,NT, Longman, Inc.
  • 6American Evaluation Association. (1995).Guiding principles for evaluators. San Francisco,CA : Jossey - Bass Publishers.
  • 7Sanders, J. R. ( 1994 ). The program evaluation standards. Newbury Park, CA:SAGE Publica-tions ,Inc.
  • 8Scriven, M. The Methodology of Evaluation [A]. Tyler, H.,et al. (eds). Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation [Cj.AERAMonograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation. No. 1. Chicago : RandMcNally, 1967.39-44.
  • 9约翰.罗尔斯.正义论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2003.86.
  • 10Camilli,G. & Shepard, L.A. Methods for IdentifyingBiased Test Items [ M ] .Thousand Oaks : Sage Publications, 1994.

共引文献75

同被引文献73

引证文献10

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部