加压交锁钉对比静力交锁钉治疗下肢长骨骨折临床观察

Clinical observation on application between compression interlocking nails and static interlocking nails in treatment of lower limb long bone fracture

目的探讨加压交锁钉与静力交锁钉治疗下肢长骨骨折的应用效果。方法选取下肢长骨骨折患者98例，根据治疗方法不同分为治疗组和对照组，各49例。对照组采取静力交锁钉治疗，治疗组采取加压锁钉治疗，对比2组治疗效果和并发症。结果治疗组和对照组优良率差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）；治疗组并发症发生率低于对照组（P〈0．05）。结论下肢长骨骨折采取加压交锁钉治疗效果显著且相对安全，值得借鉴。

Objective To compare the effect between compression interlocking nails and static interlocking nails in treatment of lower limb long bone fracture. Methods A total of 98 patients with long bone fracture were divided into treatment group （n = 49 ） and control （n = 49）. Compression interlocking nails were used for fracture fixation in treatment group, while static interlocking nails were used in control group. The primary outcomes observed were clinical effect and complication. Results There was no significant difference in recovery rate between two groups （P 〉 0.05 ）. The incidence of complication was lower in treatment group than that in control group （P 〈 0.05 ）. Conclusion Compression interlocking nail is effective and safe in fixation of lower limb long bone fractures.