期刊文献+

语言水平及结对方式对同伴反馈效果的影响研究 被引量:4

Impacts of Linguistic Proficiency and Partnership on Peer Feedback
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究对比分析了中国英语学习者在不同分组情况下同伴反馈活动的过程和效果。数据来自于某三本院校英语专业一年级四个平行班中120名学生的写作文本及随访记录。调查发现同伴反馈对各个小组学生的写作能力总体上都产生积极影响,但小组内部成员的语言水平及结对方式影响同伴反馈的效果。综合考虑反馈质量、有效采纳数量及写作文本提高分数等因素,高低配对组是同伴反馈的最大受益者,依次是高高组、低低组,而低高组的反馈效果最不理想。 This paper conducted a survey of 120 subjects selected from first-year English major students from four parallel classes to compare and analyze the process and effects of peer feedback in varied groups, with the data to be collected from the subjects' writings and interviews. The results indicated that peer feedback has a positive impact on students' writing ability of each group while linguistic proficiency and partnership within a group impact the peer feedback. Considering all the factors of feedback quality, effective rate and improved scores of writing texts, the present study suggests that the high-low paired group is the most effective, followed by high-high group and low-low group, while the low-high group is comparably unsatisfactory.
作者 冯美娜
出处 《宁波大学学报(教育科学版)》 2015年第2期16-20,共5页 Journal of Ningbo University(Educational Science Edition)
基金 2013年浙江省教育厅高等学校访问学者发展项目"语言水平与同伴反馈效果的相关性研究"(FX 2013162)
关键词 语言水平 配对方式 写作 同伴反馈 proficiency paired pattern writing peer feedback
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献85

  • 1高莉莉.专业英语写作教学中同级讨论的有效性研究[J].太原师范学院学报(社会科学版),2004,3(3):152-154. 被引量:10
  • 2蒋宇红.在线同伴评价在写作能力发展中的作用[J].外语教学与研究,2005,37(3):226-230. 被引量:122
  • 3杨苗.中国英语写作课教师反馈和同侪反馈对比研究[J].现代外语,2006,29(3):293-301. 被引量:222
  • 4Nelson,G.L.,& Murphy,J.M.1992."An L2 writing group:Task and social dimensions".Journal of Second Language Writing 1.
  • 5Nelson,G.L.,& Carson,J.G.1998."ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups".Journal of Second Language Writing 7/2.
  • 6Paulus,T.M.1999."The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing".Journal of Second Language Writing 8/3.
  • 7Saito,H.1994."Teachers' practices and students' preferences for feedback on second language writing:A case study of adult ESL learners".TESL Canada Journal 11.
  • 8Tsui,A.,& Ng,M.2000."Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?".Journal of Second Language Writing 9/2.
  • 9Zhang,S.1995."Re examining the affective advantages of peer feedback in the ESL writing class".Journal of Second Language Writing 4/3.
  • 10Berg,E.C.1999."The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality".Journal of Second Language Writing 8/3.

共引文献272

同被引文献38

  • 1左年念.外语作文评阅与学生写作能力提高之间的关系——研究综述[J].外语教学与研究,2002,34(5):55-59. 被引量:111
  • 2郭翠红,秦晓晴.国外二语学习者作文书面反馈研究——研究的视角及对大学英语作文评改的启示[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2006,29(5):59-63. 被引量:104
  • 3莫俊华.同伴互评:提高大学生写作自主性[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2007,30(3):35-39. 被引量:214
  • 4龚晓斌.英语写作教学:优化的同伴反馈[J].国外外语教学,2007(3):47-51. 被引量:110
  • 5Ashwell, T. Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom : Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? [ J ]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2000, (3) :227 - 257.
  • 6Bitchener, J. , S. Young. & D. Cameron. The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing[ J ]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2005, (14) : 191 - 205.
  • 7Chandler, J. The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of I2 student writing [ J ]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2003, ( 12 ) : 267 - 296.
  • 8Chiang, S. The importance of cohesive conditions to perceptions of writing quality at the early stages of foreign language learning [ J ]. System, 2003, ( 31 ) :471 - 484.
  • 9Ellis, R. , Y. Sheen, M. Murakami & H. Takashima. The effects of focused and unfoeused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context [ J ]. System, 2008, (36) :353 -371.
  • 10Ferris, D. R. Response to Student Writing : Implications for Second-Language Students [ M ]. Mahwah : Lawrence Elbaum Associates,Inc. , 2003.

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部