归属、规模、规制:对中国体育学科发展的认识——一种学科方向探究

Ownership,Scales,Regulations:Consideration of China's Sports Discipline in Current—— A Discussion on Discipline Direction

当前,中国体育学科的话语地位及学科符号正在不断规范和前行,其中,围绕"学科归属"、"学科规模"、"学科规制"等问题的争论较为集中,理由在于,它们导致了中国体育学科体系分类不明、学位管理的混乱、学问与学说的缺失等问题的出现。然而,学科归属、学科规模及学科规制更应该是一种学科的外在标准,中国的体育学科在规模和规制上已基本形成自己相对独立的体系,问题关键在于学科的"内生"发展。研究认为,中国体育学科的基本方向应在学科内容上从学科分类走向问题关注,研究范式由描述研究走向解释研究,知识建构由联姻嫁接走向内生创新,以更快的实现由"历时态"发展走向"共时态"压缩的历史进程。

At present, speak status and subject symbol of Chinese sports discipline is constantly norms and forward, in which, the debate of ＂ownership of discipline＂ , ＂subject scale＂, ＂subject regulation＂ is more concentrated, the reason is that they lead to the classification of Chinese sports discipline system is unclear, confusion of management degree and the absence of knowl- edge and theory. However, author thinks that the ownership, scale and regulation more should be the external standard of discipline, the Chinese sports discipline in scale and regulation should be still ＂up hill＂, the key is to the endogenous development of subject; at the same time, the research points out that basic direction of Chinese sports science development should be from the ＂discipline classification＂ to the ＂problem concern＂ in the content, research para- digm is from ＂descriptive study＂ to ＂explanation research＂, knowledge construction is from the ＂grafting marriage＂ to ＂endogenous innovation＂, by which, it can improve faster sports disci- pline from ＂diachronic process＂ to ＂synchronic comoression＂.