期刊文献+

基于全科医疗的“社区首诊和双向转诊责任制”政策框架及要素 被引量:38

Policy framework and components for general practice-based gatekeeping and referral system
下载PDF
导出
摘要 社区首诊和双向转诊制度是合理配置卫生资源的核心制度之一,本质是关于病人在医疗服务体系中的进入点和流向的规则,背后隐含着众多利益相关方,其中各方权利、责任与利益分配复杂。因此,构建一个系统的政策框架,对顺利推进和不断完善社区首诊和双向转诊制度具有重要意义。本文给出以全科医疗为基础的社区首诊和双向转诊责任制(下简称"社区双诊责任制")的定义与内涵,揭示该政策的价值基础。建立包括十大要素在内的"社区双诊责任制"政策框架。描述了每一个要素所涵盖的组织,界定了政府、市场、社会和个人在其中的责任义务以及他们之间的互动关系模式,最终形成一个较为系统完整的政策框架。 Gatekeeping and referral system are core institutional arrangements in health resource allocation which regulate the consumers’ entry points and their fluxion in the healthcare service delivery system. Hiding behind such arrangements are numerous stakeholders and their sophisticated interactions of obligation, responsibility and ben-efits. For this reason, it is of great importance to build a more systematic and integrated policy framework to promote and impoverish the gatekeeping and referral system. This paper puts forward the definition of“general practice-based gatekeeping and referral system” and revealed the political values embedded in it. We then identified the ten essen-tial components for policy implementation based on this definition. For each component, we recognized the involved actors, and elaborated their obligations, boundaries and interactions. This ten-component policy framework could be used in the international comparison research as a map, guiding the implementation of gatekeeping and referral system.
作者 匡莉
出处 《中国卫生政策研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第2期19-26,共8页 Chinese Journal of Health Policy
基金 广州市医药卫生科技项目(20141A031003)
关键词 全科医疗 社区首诊 双向转诊 政策框架 要素 General practice Gatekeeping Referral system Policy framework Component
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1杨辉,Shane Thomas,Colette Browning.患者旅程与转诊行为:澳大利亚的模式及对中国的启发[J].中国全科医学,2009,12(1):3-10. 被引量:11
  • 2Sweeney B. The referral system [ J]. BMJ, 1994, 309 (6963) : I180-1181.
  • 3Murtagh J. John Murtagh's General Practice [ M ]. McGraw- Hill, 20O7.
  • 4Lauridsen S. Administrative Gatekeeping-a third way be- tween unrestricted patient advocacy and bedside rationing [J]. Bioethic, 2009, 23(5)- 311-320.
  • 5Macinko J, Starfield B, Shi L. The contribution of primary care systems to health outcomes within Organization for Eco- nomic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries, 1970-1998[ J ]. Health Services Research, 2003, 38 (3) : 831-865.
  • 6Kutzin J. A deseriptive framework for eountry-level analysis of health care financing arrangements [ J ]. Health Policy, 2001, 56 : 171-204.
  • 7Parvinen P, Savage G T. The Relevance of Health Care Ac- cess SystemS: An Exploratory Study of Seven IndustrializedCountry. International Health Care Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 331-373.
  • 8杨辉,刘朝杰,Shane Thomas.澳大利亚全科医学服务质量管理框架、措施及借鉴[J].中国全科医学,2006,9(11):869-874. 被引量:14
  • 9Kroneman M W, Maarse H, Jouke Van der Zee. Direct ac- cess in primary care and patient satisfaction: A European study[J]. Health Policy, 2006, 76: 72-79.
  • 10欧阳俊婷,朱先,匡莉,等.基于REAIM模型的基本公共卫生服务项目实施障碍因素的结构:以广州市为例[J].中国卫生资源,2015,18(1):79-83.

二级参考文献121

共引文献252

同被引文献372

引证文献38

二级引证文献309

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部