关于我国英语能力等级量表描述语库建设的若干问题被引量：43

Several Problems about Developing a Descriptor Pool of China Common Framework for English Proficiency Scale

下载PDF

导出

摘要本文讨论在中国英语语言等级量表研制过程中与描述语库建设有关的几个重要问题,包括语言能力构念,量表的心理测量学模型和参数描述体系,"能做"描述语的语义结构,以及描述语的来源和规范等。本文还特别强调社会文化和意识形态在构建中国英语等级量表话语体系中的重要性。 In this paper, several problems about developing a descriptor pool are discussed, including language ability construct, psychometrics model and parameter description system of the scale, the semantic structure of the ＂can do＂ description and the source of the descriptors, etc. The paper also emphasizes the importance of the social culture and ideology in constructing English Proficiency Scale in China.

作者朱正才

机构地区上海交通大学外国语学院

出处《中国考试》 2015年第4期11-17,共7页 journal of China Examinations

基金教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"语言测试公平研究--科学与道德(项目编号:13YJA740088)"的研究成果

关键词考试招生制度改革外语测评体系语言能力构念行为锚定等级量表能做描述 Examination and Enrollment System Reform Foreign Language Testing and Assessment Language Ability Construct Behavioral Anchored Rating Scale Can-Do Description

分类号 G405 [文化科学—教育学原理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献6

1高靓.我国首个国家外语能力测评体系建设工作正式启动[N].中国教育报,2014-10-31(1).
2教育部考试中心.中国英语能力等级量表工作手册[R].北京,2014.
3韩宝成.国外语言能力量表述评[J].外语教学与研究,2006,38(6):443-450. 被引量：119
4Council of Europe. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment [M]. Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 2001.
5North, B. The development of a common framework scale of lan- guage proficiency [M]. New York: P. Lang, 2000.
6Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krath- wohl, D. R. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain[M]. New York: David McKay, 1956.

二级参考文献31

1Alderson, J, 1991. Brands and scores [A]. In J. Alderson & B. North (eds.). Language Testing in the 1990s [C]. London: Modern English Publication and the British Council.
2Ameriacn Council for the Teaching of Foreign Languages. 1983. ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines Revised 1985 [M]. Hastingson Hudsonm, NY: ACTFL Material Center.
3Association of Language Testers in Europe (ALTE). 1994. A description of the framework of the Association of Language Testers in Europe [ Z ]. Cambridge, ALTE Document 4.
4Bachman, L. F. 1988, Problems in examining the validity of the ACFFL oral proficiency interview [J ]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10 : 149-164.
5Bachman, L. F. & J. L. D. Clark. 1987. The measurement of foreign/second language proficiency [J ].Annals of the American Association of Political and Social Science 490: 20-33.
6Bachman, L. F. & A. S. Palmer. 1982. The construct validation of some components of communicative proficiency [J]. TESOL Quarterly 16: 449-465.
7Bachman, L. F. & S. J. Savignon. 1986. The evaluation of communicative language proficiency: A critique of the ACTFL oral interview [ J ]. The Modern Language Journal 70 : 380-390.
8Brindley, G. 1986. The Assessment of Second Language Proficiency: Issues and Approaches [ M]. Adelaide: National Curriculum Resource Center.
9Brindley, G. 1991. Defining language ability: The criteria for criteria [A]. In S. Anivan (ed.). Current Developments in Language Testing [C]. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Center.
10Brown, J. D. & T, Hudson. 2002. Criterion-referenced Language Testing [M].Cambridge: CLIP.