期刊文献+

戴名世与清前期文化政策 被引量:1

Dai Ming Shi and cultural policy of early qing dynasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 戴名世因《南山集》案彰显悲情的一生。其实,探究戴名世的字号、文章及交游发现:此案发生的必然性在于,戴氏作为士人的一个代表存在着对朝廷的认同问题,而这在清统治者看来是不可容忍的。康熙帝处理此案采取了高压与怀柔并用的手段,这并不违背"稽古右文"以集大成的文化政策。历经此案劫后,清代士人群体特别是桐城籍士人,及时调整了与当朝的关系,消解夷夏之别的文化隔阂,彰显古文经世致用的现实功能,不仅使大部分士人割断了与前朝的联系,而且也促使桐城派的产生,进而"北方之强"与"南方之强"在有清一代中奏出具有总结和整理特色的文化强音。戴名世作为使桐城籍士人以古文与当朝建立的关系转折性的人物,显然,研究桐城派不可绕过戴名世,更不能忽视清前期的文化政策。 Because of the Case 'The volume of Nanshan' , Dai ming- shi lifetime was full of the pathetic. In facl, exploring his font, articles, and friends : As a representative of scholars, The necessity of the case is because of the identity question between the court and himself , and the phenomenon which qing dynast could' t acceptable. To deal with the Case, Emperor Kangxi took the methods of control and molification, the methods can' t violation the whole cultural policy of ' JI GU YOU WEN ' . After this case ended , the scholars of qing dynast, especially for the the place of TongCheng origin, Adjust to the relationships with the reign in time, dispelling the cultural gulf differents outlooks on YI - XIA, and the scholars demostrated the real functions of the ancient Chi- nese prose about the emphasizing statecraft, It not only help the majority of the scholars cut of the relations with previous dynasty, but also encourged the school of Tongcheng established, and then in Qing dynasty , the powerful of the north and the south ' have colli- sioned to expressed the cultural characteristics of summarized and arranged. Dai ruing - shi, the watershelds person in place of TongCheng origin which used ancient Chinese prose to make a relationships with the reign. Obviously , As we studying the TongCheng school, we can' t bypassing the person called ' Dai Ming Shi' , more cannot igore the cultural policy in earlier Qing dynasty.
作者 盛险峰
机构地区 安徽大学历史系
出处 《北方论丛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期88-93,共6页 The Northern Forum
基金 横向项目"国学对于现代国民性建构的功能研究"(2013SKH010033)成果之一
关键词 戴名世 清前期 《南山集》案 经世致用 桐城派 Dai Ming Shi early qing dynasty the Case 'The volume of Nanshan' Emphasizing statecraft Tongcheng school
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1(清)戴名世撰.王树民编校.戴名世集[M].北京:中华书局,1986.
  • 2[法]戴廷杰,著.戴名世年谱[M].北京:中华书局,2004.
  • 3王树民,等编校.戴名世遗文集[M].北京:中华书局,2002.
  • 4(清)方苞著,刘季高点校.方苞集[M].上海:上海世纪出版有限公司,上海古籍出版社,2008.
  • 5(清)马其昶撰,彭君华点校.桐城耆旧传[M].合肥:黄山书社,1990.
  • 6(汉)郑玄注,(唐)孔颖达,等疏.礼记正义[c]//十三经注疏本.上海:上海古籍出版社,2007.
  • 7清实录[M].北京:中华书局,1986.
  • 8俞樟华.近十几年来戴名世研究综述[J].文史知识,1997(1):63-67. 被引量:1
  • 9张玉.从新发现的档案谈戴名世《南山集》案[J].历史档案,2001,14(2):91-96. 被引量:13
  • 10(晋)杜预注,(唐)孔颖达等疏:春秋左传正义[C]//十三经注疏本.上海:上海古籍出版社,2007.

二级参考文献10

  • 1《清朝野史大观》卷三.
  • 2《清圣祖实录》,康熙五十年十月丁卯条.
  • 3[3,4,5,6,7]中国第一历史档案馆藏内阁刑科史书,499卷.
  • 4[14,15,17]中国第一历史档案馆藏内阁刑科史书,537卷.
  • 5《清代文字狱案》,紫禁城出版社1991年版.
  • 6《清圣祖实录》,康熙五十四年六月戈辰条.
  • 7《清圣祖实录》,康熙五十三年六月丙子条.
  • 8《清圣祖实录》,康熙五十二年七月辛酉条.
  • 9《清圣祖实录》,康熙五十一年四月壬戌条.
  • 10《清高宗实录》,乾隆四年五月戊午条.

共引文献46

同被引文献32

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部