期刊文献+

标准审计报告改进与投资者感知的审计人员责任——一项实验证据 被引量:51

Proposed Amendments to the Standard Audit Report and Investor Perception of Auditor′s Responsibility——An experimental evidence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近期,国际审计与鉴证准则理事会发布了新制定的审计报告准则,美国公众公司会计监督委员会也提议修改审计准则,其中最主要的变化是在标准审计报告中增加披露重要审计事项。本文采用实验研究方法,检验了增加披露重要审计事项的标准审计报告对投资者感知的审计人员责任的影响。研究发现,在审计之后发现重大错报的情况下,标准审计报告中披露重要审计事项减轻了投资者感知的审计人员的责任;相对于标准审计报告中披露的重要审计事项与之后发现的重大错报事项不一致情况,当两者一致时,投资者感知的审计人员责任最低。本文对监管部门了解改进后审计报告可能的影响具有重要意义。 Recently, the IAASB has release its new auditor reporting standards. Meanwhile, the PCAOB was also pro- posing to revise the corresponding standards. Among the new or proposed auditor reporting standards, the main change is the requirement of disclosing key audit matters in auditor's standard report. Using an experimental study, our paper investigates the effects of mandate disclosure of key audit matters on investor's perception of auditor responsibility. The results indicate that disclosing key audit matters in standard auditor's report decreased the investor's perceived auditor responsibility when a material misstatement discovered subsequently after the issuance of that report. Moreover, investor's perception of auditor responsibility is lower when the key audit matter is related to the subsequently discovered misstatement as compared to when they are not related. This paper will have significant implications for regulator's under- standing of the possible influence of the revised auditor's report.
机构地区 南开大学商学院
出处 《审计研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期56-63,共8页 Auditing Research
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(项目批准号:71372097)的资助
关键词 标准审计报告改进 重要审计事项 投资者感知 审计人员责任 auditor's report reform, key audit matters, investor's perception, auditor's responsibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1吴溪.审计失败中的审计责任认定与监管倾向:经验分析[J].会计研究,2007(7):53-61. 被引量:50
  • 2张丽霞,张继勋.IASB新提议的金融负债公允价值变动损益列报形式能够消除反直觉效应及投资判断偏误吗?——基于个体投资者的实验证据[J].会计研究,2013(12):3-10. 被引量:10
  • 3张继勋,韩冬梅.标准审计报告改进与投资者感知的相关性、有用性及投资决策——一项实验证据[J].审计研究,2014(3):51-59. 被引量:82
  • 4AASB. 2013. Re: Exposure Draft Reporting on Audited Financial Statements. Available at: https://www, ifac. org/sites/default/files/ pubicatins/expsure-drafts/cmments/AASBRespnsetIAASBAuditedFinanciaStatements, pdf.
  • 5Alicke, M. D. 2000. Culpable control and the psychology of blame [ J ]. Psychological Bulletin, 126 (4) : 556-574.
  • 6Alicke, M. D, J. Buckingham, E. Zell, and T. Davis. 2008. Culpable control and counterfactual reasoning in the psychology of blame [ J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34(10) : 1371-1381.
  • 7Baron, R. M. , and D. A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, stra- tegic, and statistical considerations [ J ]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 ( 6 ) : 1173-1182.
  • 8Christensen, B. E. , S. M. Glover, and C. J. Wolfe. 2014. Do Critical Audit Matter Paragraphs in the Audit Report Change Nonprofes- sional Investors' Decision to Invest? [J]. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(4) : 71-93.
  • 9Church, B. K. , S. M. Davis, and S. A. McCracken. 2008. The Auditor's Reporting Model:A Literature Overview and Research Synthe-sis[J]. Accounting Horizons 22 (1) : 69-90.
  • 10Cohn, M. 2013. PCAOB proposes to change auditor's reporting model. Accounting Today (August 13 ). Available at: http:// www. accountingtoday, com/news/PCAOB-Proposes-ChangeAuditor-Reporting-Model-67721-1, html.

二级参考文献29

共引文献138

同被引文献387

引证文献51

二级引证文献379

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部