期刊文献+

国际商事仲裁的透明度问题研究 被引量:11

Transparency in International Commercial Arbitration
原文传递
导出
摘要 保密性一直是国际商事仲裁的优点之一,但随着国际商事仲裁可仲裁事项范围的不断扩大、WTO透明度基本原则的影响以及投资仲裁透明度改革的逐步深入,国际商事仲裁领域也掀起透明度改革的浪潮。当事人协商一致将争议提交仲裁旨在能够得到公正裁决,因此如何保证仲裁程序以及裁决的公平公正尤为重要。透明度的增加可以增强国际商事仲裁的可预见性,使得当事人更加信赖这一争议解决方式,并能增进公众对仲裁的了解。国际商事仲裁领域的透明度与公众参与、披露义务不同,透明度改革并非完全摈弃或者推翻保密性。实践中,各国际商事仲裁机构也纷纷修改其仲裁规则以彰显增进透明度的决心,但由于仲裁的保密性,其执行情况仍不容乐观。 Confidentiality is a feature of international commercial arbitration, but with gradual deepening of reform of the WTO principles of transparency and transparency in investment arbitration, transparency in international commercial arbitration is also set off a wave of reform. When parties agree to submit their disputes to the fair-minded judgment of arbitrators, how to ensure a fair and impartial proceeding and award is extremely important. The increased transparency has enhanced the predictability of international commercial arbitration, make the system more reliable for its direct users, and enhance understanding of the arbitration for the general public. This paper attempts to explore the views on the transparency debate in international commercial arbitration, distinguish similarities and differences of transparency, public access, and the disclosure obligation, answer some questions on causes and prospects of the increase of transparency in international commercial arbitration, and eventually construct the basic model of transparency reforms.
作者 林其敏
出处 《河北法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期112-123,共12页 Hebei Law Science
基金 西南民族大学研究生学位点建设项目(2014XWD-S0301)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 国际商事仲裁 透明度 披露 改革模式 international commercial arbitration transparency disclosure reform
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1高扬.论商事仲裁的保密性[J].河北法学,2009,27(7):37-40. 被引量:8
  • 2Buys C G. The Tensions Between Confidentiality and Transparency in International Arbitration[ J]. Am. Rev. Intl Arb. , Vol. 14,2003:121.
  • 3Gruner D M. Accounting for the Public Interest in International Arbitration: The Need for Procedural and Structural Reform[J], Colum. J. Transnatl L., Vol. 41,2003:960.
  • 4R. Gerbay. Confidentiality vs Transparency in International Arbitration: The English Perspective [ J]. Trans- national Dispute Management, March 2012, [ 2014-6-3 ] , http ://ssrn. com/abstract = 2134137.
  • 5Paul Marcus & Vicki Waye. Australia and the United States: Two Common Criminal Justice Systems Uncom- monly at Odds[J]. Tul. J. Intl & Comp. L. , Vol. 12,Spring 2004:27.
  • 6Steve Charnovitz. Transparency and Participation in the World Trade Organization [ J]. Rutgers L. Rev. , Vol. 56, Summer 2004:927.
  • 7Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann. Challenges to the Legitimacy and Efficiency of the World Trading System: Demo- cratic Governance and Competition Culture in the WTO[J]. J. Intl Econ. L. , Vol. 7, 2004:585.
  • 8Mark Fenster. The Opacity of Transparency [J]. Iowa Law Review, Vol. 91, 2006,http://ssrn. com/ab- stract = 928550.
  • 9Carl Baudenbacher. Forward: Globalization and the Judiciary[ J]. Tex. Intl L. J. , Vol. 40, Spring 2005 : 353.
  • 10Carlos G. Garcia. All the Other Little Dirty Secrets: Investment Treaties, Latin America, and the Necessary Evil of Investor-State Arbitration[ J]. Fla. J. Intl L. ,Vol. 16,June 2004:301.

二级参考文献9

  • 1Sophie Napper, The Privy Council on Confidentiality and the Enforcement of Awards in Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Limited v. European Reinsurance Company of Zurich, 6(2) INTL A.L.R. 43 -44, 2003.
  • 2.新西兰1996年仲裁法第14条.,..
  • 3WIPO仲裁规则第52、73、74、75条.
  • 4Patrick Neill QC, Confidentiality in Arbitration, 12 Arb. Int! 287, 316 - 17, 1996.
  • 5Alexis C. Brown, Presumption Meets Reality: An Exploration of the Confidentiality Obligation in International Commercial Arbitration, 16 Am. U. lntl L. Rev. 969, 2001.
  • 6Anjanette H, Raymond, Confidentiality in A Forom of Last Resort: Is the Use of Confidential Arbitration A Good Idea for Business and Society? 16 Am. Rev. Intl Arb. 479, 2005,
  • 7Gu Weixia, Confidentiality Revisited: Blessing or Curse in International Commercial Arbitration? IS Am. Rev. Intl Arb. 607, 2004.
  • 8[英]艾伦·雷德芬,马丁·亨特.等.林一飞,宋连斌译.国际商事仲裁法律与实践·第四版[M].北京大学出版社,2005.30,31.
  • 9.西班牙2003年仲裁法第32条.,..

共引文献7

同被引文献109

引证文献11

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部