期刊文献+

语块频率、结构类型及英语水平对中国英语学习者语块加工的影响 被引量:40

The effects of formulaic sequence frequency,structures and English proficiency on Chinese EFL learners' processing of formulaic sequences
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以两组不同水平的中国英语学习者为研究对象,通过在线语法判断实验,考察了语块频率、语块结构类型以及学习者英语水平对他们语块加工的影响。研究发现:1)中高水平和中低水平学习者的语块加工都具有频率效应,且该效应不仅存在于短语类语块的加工中,也存在于非短语类语块加工中;2)语块结构类型对不同水平组受试的影响不同,该因素对较低水平学习者的影响较大;3)总体上,相比中低水平组,中高水平组对不同类别语块的识别速度更快、错误率更低,但相比短语类语块,英语水平对学习者正确识别非短语语块能力的影响更大。本文研究发现可为基于使用的语言习得观提供实证支持证据,显现出语言学习经验在学习者语块心理表征与加工中的重要性。 By comparing the performance on a grammaticality judgment task among two groups of nonEnglish majors at two proficiency levels,this study investigates the effects of formulaic sequence frequency,structures and English proficiency on Chinese learners'processing of L2 formulaic sequences.The results show that 1)both higher and lower proficiency learners benefit from the processing advantage of high-frequency sequences,and this advantage can be observed not only for phrasal sequences,but for non-phrasal ones;2)the effect of formulaic structures on lower proficiency learners is higher than that on higher proficiency learners;3)higher proficiency learners generally perform better than lower proficiency learners on different types of L2 formulaic sequences(with lower error rate and faster speed),but the effect of L2 proficiency is more pronounced on the identification of non-phrasal sequences than on phrasal ones.Findings of the current study can provide empirical support for usage-based approaches to language acquisition,by demonstrating the importance of L2 learning experience in the processing and representation of L2 formulaic sequences.
机构地区 上海交通大学
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期393-404,480-481,共12页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Arnon, I. & U. Cohen-Priva. 2013. More than words: The effect of multi-word frequency and constituency on phonetic duration EJ]. Language and Speech 56: 349-371.
  • 2Arnon, I. & N. Snider. 2010. More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 62: 67-82.
  • 3Biber, D. & F. Barbieri. 2007. Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers EJ]. English for Specific Purposes 26: 263-286.
  • 4Biber, D., S. Johansson, G. Leech, S. Conrad &E. Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English [M]. Harlow: Pearson Education. Ellis, N. 2002.
  • 5Frequency effects in language processing and acquisition J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 143-188.
  • 6Ellis, N. 2006. Cognitive perspectives on SLA: The associative-cognitive CREED EJ]. A/LA Review 19: 100-121.
  • 7Ellis, N. & R. Simpson-Vlach. 2009. Formulaic language in native speakers: Triangulating psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and education [-J]. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5: 61-78.
  • 8Ellis, R. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition[M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 9Erman, B. &B. Warren. 2000. The idiom principle and the open choice principle [J]. Text 20 : 29-62.
  • 10Gass, S. & A. Mackey. 2002. Frequency effects and second language acquisition: A complex picture? EJ]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 249-260.

二级参考文献241

共引文献422

同被引文献347

引证文献40

二级引证文献123

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部