期刊文献+

胸腔镜微创与开放食管癌根治术围手术期并发症和淋巴结清扫情况的回顾性比较 被引量:53

Retrospective comparative study of preoperative complications and lymphadenectomy between thoracoscopic esophagectomy and open procedure
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 比较胸腔镜微创与开放食管切除术治疗食管癌患者的围手术期并发症和淋巴结清扫情况差异.方法 回顾性分析2012年10月至2014年4月间207例在天津肿瘤医院行手术治疗的食管癌患者资料,胸腔镜微创食管癌切除术125例(胸腔镜组),开放食管癌切除术82例(开放组).胸腔镜组中109例行单纯胸腔镜加开腹手术,16例行胸腹全腔镜联合手术.结果 与开放组相比,胸腔镜组患者术后需要有创治疗的肺不张[0.8% (1/125)比7.3% (6/82)]、胸腔积液[0(0/125)比4.9% (4/82)]及急性呼吸窘迫[0(0/125)比6.1%(5/82)]等严重呼吸系统并发症发生率下降;术中可疑胸导管损伤结扎[3.2%(4/125)比15.9% (13/82)]、喉返神经损伤[19.2%(24/125)比32.9% (27/82)]以及术后乳糜胸发生率[0(0/125)比4.9% (4/82)]降低;清扫右喉返神经链淋巴结数[(1.91±0.73)枚比(1.12±0.81)枚]及成功率[97.6%(122/125)比89.0% (73/82)]增加;但清扫左喉返神经链淋巴结枚数[(0.93±0.71)比(1.76±0.84)]及成功率[52%(65/125)比76.8% (63/82)]降低;差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).两组间术后肺部感染、吻合口瘘、脓胸、食管气管瘘、二次开腹、二次开胸、伤口感染、心律失常、心力衰竭、肾功能衰竭、肝功能不全和脑梗塞等发生率及病死率的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);食管旁、隆凸下及肺门淋巴结清扫亦无统计学差异(均P>0.05).结论 胸腔镜微创食管癌手术能够降低严重呼吸系统并发症发生,减少胸导管及喉返神经损伤,清扫右喉返神经链淋巴结优势明显,但清扫左侧喉返神经链淋巴结难度大,仍存在改进提升空间. Objective To analyze the differences in paraoperative morbidity and lymph node dissection between thoracoscopic esophagectomy and open procedure.Methods From October 2012 to April 2014,207 patients with esophageal cancer underwent surgery.125 patients underwent video-assisted esophagectomy,and 82 underwent open procedure.In the minimally invasive group,there were 109 thoracoscopic cases and 16 thoracolaparoscopic cases.Results There were significant differences between the thoracoscope group and the open group in atelectasis(0.8% vs.7.3%,P < 0.05),pleural effusion (0 vs.4.9%,P < 0.05),acute respiratory distress (0 vs.6.1%,P < 0.05),ligation of thoracic duct (3.2% vs.15.9 %,P < 0.05),recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (19.2% vs.32.9%,P < 0.05),c hylothorax (0 vs.4.9%,P < 0.05),number of lymphonode along the right recurrent laryngeal nerve lymphatic chains[1.91 ± 0.73 vs.1.12 ± 0.81,P < 0.05)] and achievement ratio(97.6% vs.89.0%,P <0.05) and number of lymphonode along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymphatic chains (0.93 ± 0.71 vs.1.76 ± 0.84,P < 0.05) and achievement ratio(52% vs.76.8%,P < 0.05).No significant differences were observed in pneumonia,anastomotic leak,thoracic abscess,esophago-tracheal fistula,re-laparotomy,re-thoracotomy,wound infection,arrhythmia,cardia failure,renal failure,hepatic inadequacy,cerbral infarction,and mortality(P > 0.05).There were also no significant differences in number of lymphonode and achievement ratio of periesophagel lymph nodes,subcarinal lymph nodes and hilar lymph nodes (all P > 0.05).Conclusion The thoracoscopic esophagectomy has some obvious advantage associated with less pulmonary complications,lower injury of thoracic duct and recurrent laryngeal nerve,more lymphonode and higher achievement ratio along the right recurrent laryngeal nerve lymphatic chains.But it has still a larger space for improvement of lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymphatic chains.
出处 《中华胸心血管外科杂志》 CSCD 2015年第5期260-263,共4页 Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
关键词 食管肿瘤 食管切除术 胸腔镜 术后并发症 淋巴结清扫 Esophageal neoplasms Esophagectomy Thoracoscopy Postoperative complications Lymph node dissection
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献60

  • 1朱成楚,陈仕林,叶敏华.电视胸腔镜下行食管癌手术胸部淋巴结清扫[J].中华外科杂志,2005,43(10):628-630. 被引量:73
  • 2方文涛,陈文虎,陈勇,沈宇舟,蒋勇.选择性颈胸腹三野淋巴结清扫治疗胸段食管鳞癌[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(5):388-391. 被引量:46
  • 3Biere S S,Cuesta M A,van der Peet D L.Minimally invasiveversus open esophagectomy for cancer:a systematic review andmeta-analysis[J].Minerva Chir,2009,64(2):121-133.
  • 4Elorza-Orúe J L,Larburu-Etxaniz S,Asensio-Gallego J I,et al.Minimally invasive esophagectomy[J].Cir Esp,2006,80(3):151-156.
  • 5Verhage R J,Hazebroek E J,Boone J,et al.Minimally invasivesurgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy forcancer:a systematic review of the literature[J].Minerva Chir,2009,64(2):135-146.
  • 6Gao Y,Wang Y,Chen L,et al.Comparison of open three-fieldand minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer[J].Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg,2011,12(3):366-369.
  • 7Santillan A A,Farma J M,Meredith K L,et al.Minimallyinvasive surgery for esophageal cancer[J].J Natl Compr CancNetw,2008,6(9):879-884.
  • 8Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EVA, et al Hospitalvolume and surgical mortality in the United States. N EngI J Med, 2002,346:1128-1137.
  • 9Kinjo Y, Kurita N, Nakamura F, et al. Effectiveness oti combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complications and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal car~cer. Surg Endosc, 2012,26(2): 381-390.
  • 10Zingg U, Smithers BM, Gotley DC, et al. Factors associated with postoperative pulmonary morbidity after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann SurgOncol, 2011,18(5) : 1460-1468.

共引文献162

同被引文献457

引证文献53

二级引证文献328

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部