TOD概念的发展及其中国化被引量：66

Evolving TOD Concept and Its Sinicization

导出

摘要 TOD是一种以公共交通为导向的城市规划手法,提倡紧凑、混合用地布局和公共空间。在中国目前快速城市化的发展背景下,清晰地了解TOD理论的完整内涵和价值对于解决我国当前大城市无序扩张所带来的拥挤和环境问题尤为重要。本文在回顾TOD的概念起源及演变的基础上,对其相关概念进行了辨析,并对TOD在演变过程中出现的几大主要类别及其特征进行归纳,最后结合中国的背景对TOD中国化的应用方向进行了探讨,以期为中国城市未来发展提供新的发展思路。 TOD （Transit Oriented Development） is a technological means of urban planning oriented by public transport, advocating compact and mix land-use layout and public space. It is useful to comprehensively understand the meaning and value of TOD theory in order to solve the problem of congestion and pollution brought by the disordered expansion of big cities under the context of rapid urbanization in China. This article critically discriminates the related concepts of TOD based on the review of origin and evolution of TOD theory. It further summarizes the main category of TOD during its evolving process, analyzing the characteristic of each category. Finally, the application direction of TOD＇s sinicization within the Chinese background is demonstrated, aiming to provide implications for the development of Chinese cities in the future.

作者李珽史懿亭符文颖

机构地区广州中大城乡规划设计研究院有限公司深圳市蕾奥城市规划设计咨询有限公司华南师范大学地理科学学院

出处《国际城市规划》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期72-77,共6页 Urban Planning International

基金国家自然科学基金项目(41301109) 教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金(教外司留[2013]1792号)联合资助

关键词 TOD 公共交通混合用地中国化 TOD Public Transit Mix Land-use Sinicization

分类号 TU984.191 [建筑科学—城市规划与设计]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献42

1任春洋.美国公共交通导向发展模式(TOD)的理论发展脉络分析[J].国际城市规划,2010,25(4):92-99. 被引量：45
2Bossard E G. Envisioning Neighborhoods with Transit-orientedDevelopment Potential[R]. The Mineta Transportation Institute, San JoseState University, 2002.
3Cervero R. Transit-supportive Development in the United States :Experiences and Prospects[R]. Washington, D.C.: University of Californiaat Berkeley, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, 1993.
4马强.近年来北美关于“TOD”的研究进展[J].国外城市规划,2003,18(5):45-50. 被引量：81
5Babcock R F. The Zoning Game[M]. The University of Wisconsin Press,1966.
6Jacobs J. The Death and Life of Great American CitiesfM]. New York:Random House, 1961.
7Ford L R. Lynch Revisited: New Urbanism and Theories of Good CityForm[J]. Cities, 1999,16(4): 247-257.
8Ellin N. Postmodern Urbanism[M]. Princeton Architectural Pr,1999.
9Katz P. The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community[M].McGraw-Hill Professional, 1994.
10Calthorpe P. The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and theAmerican Dream[M]. New York: Princeton Architecture Press, 1993.