摘要
对基层司法制度的研究主要表现为"制度—过程","自上而下的知识规划—自下而上的知识策略"和"国家—社会"三种二元对立范式,以及"语境论","相对合理主义"和"当事人中心"三种一元范式。由于上述范式难以避免陷入法教义学与社科法学方法论上的论争,有必要用"以主体为中心"的第三条道路整合上述范式和多元方法论的冲突。在此意义上,"以主体为中心"的第三条道路以"主体"的多样性、多元方法论的整合、保持"关联-阐释"观和"理论-实践-理论"为核心要素。
Researches on the grass -roots judicial system of China fall into three kinds of dual opposite paradigms: the "system - process", the "top -down knowledge planning and bottom -up knowledge strategy" and the "state -society" as well as another three kinds of mono - paradigms: the "contextual theory", the "relative rationalism" and the "client - centered". Because the above para- digms face controversies in the Legal Dogmatics and the methodologies of Social Sciences of Law, it is necessary to adopt the "subject - centered" as the third road to solve the conflicts between the above - mentioned paradigms and multi - methodologies while maintai- ning the key factors like "relevance - interpretation concept" and "theory - practice - theory approach".
出处
《云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第4期143-150,共8页
Journal of Yunnan Minzu University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
基层司法制度
以主体为中心
社科法学
法教义学
grass - roots judicial system
subject - centered
Social Sciences of Law
Legal Dogmatics