期刊文献+

Risk scoring system and predictor for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy 被引量:23

Risk scoring system and predictor for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To establish a scoring system to predict clinicallyrelevant postoperative pancreatic fistula(CR-POPF)after pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD).METHODS: The clinical records of 921 consecutive patients who underwent PD between 2008 and 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. Postoperative pancreatic fistula(POPF) was defined and classified by the international study group of pancreatic fistula(ISGPF).We used a logistic regression model to determine the independent risk factors of CR-POPF and developed a scoring system based on the regression coefficient of the logistic regression model. The optimal cut-off value to divide the risk strata was determined by the Youden index. The patients were divided into two groups(low risk and high risk). The independent sample t test was used to detect differences in the means of drain amylase on postoperative day(POD) 1, 2 and 3. The optimal cut-off level of the drain amylase to distinguish CR-POPF from non-clinical POPF in the two risk strata groups was determined using the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curves.RESULTS: Grade A POPF occurred in 106(11.5%)patients, grade B occurred in 57(6.2%) patients,and grade C occurred in 32(3.5%) patients. A predictive scoring system for CR-POPF(0-6 points) was constructed using the following four factors: 1 point for each body mass index ≥ 28 [odds ratio(OR) = 3.86;95% confidence interval(CI): 1.92-7.75, P = 0.00],soft gland texture(OR = 4.50; 95%CI, 2.53-7.98, P =0.00), and the difference between the blood loss and transfusion in operation ≥ 800 mL(OR = 3.45; 95%CI,1.92-7.75, P = 0.00); and from 0 points for a 5 mm or greater duct diameter to 3 points for a less than 2 mm duct(OR = 8.97; 95%CI: 3.70-21.77, P = 0.00). The ROC curve showed that the area under the curve of this score was 0.812. A score of 3 points was suggested to be the best cut-off value(Youden index = 0.485). In the low risk group, a drain amylase level ≥ 3600 U/L on POD3 could distinguish CR-POPF from non-clinicalPOPF(the sensitivity and specificity were 75% and85%, respectively). In the high risk group, the best cutoff was a drain amylase level of 1600(the sensitivity and specificity were 77 and 63%, respectively).CONCLUSION: A 6-point scoring system accurately predicted the occurrence of CR-POPF. In addition, a drain amylase level on POD3 might be a predictor of this complication. AIM: To establish a scoring system to predict clinicallyrelevant postoperative pancreatic fistula(CR-POPF)after pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD).METHODS: The clinical records of 921 consecutive patients who underwent PD between 2008 and 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. Postoperative pancreatic fistula(POPF) was defined and classified by the international study group of pancreatic fistula(ISGPF).We used a logistic regression model to determine the independent risk factors of CR-POPF and developed a scoring system based on the regression coefficient of the logistic regression model. The optimal cut-off value to divide the risk strata was determined by the Youden index. The patients were divided into two groups(low risk and high risk). The independent sample t test was used to detect differences in the means of drain amylase on postoperative day(POD) 1, 2 and 3. The optimal cut-off level of the drain amylase to distinguish CR-POPF from non-clinical POPF in the two risk strata groups was determined using the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curves.RESULTS: Grade A POPF occurred in 106(11.5%)patients, grade B occurred in 57(6.2%) patients,and grade C occurred in 32(3.5%) patients. A predictive scoring system for CR-POPF(0-6 points) was constructed using the following four factors: 1 point for each body mass index ≥ 28 [odds ratio(OR) = 3.86;95% confidence interval(CI): 1.92-7.75, P = 0.00],soft gland texture(OR = 4.50; 95%CI, 2.53-7.98, P =0.00), and the difference between the blood loss and transfusion in operation ≥ 800 mL(OR = 3.45; 95%CI,1.92-7.75, P = 0.00); and from 0 points for a 5 mm or greater duct diameter to 3 points for a less than 2 mm duct(OR = 8.97; 95%CI: 3.70-21.77, P = 0.00). The ROC curve showed that the area under the curve of this score was 0.812. A score of 3 points was suggested to be the best cut-off value(Youden index = 0.485). In the low risk group, a drain amylase level ≥ 3600 U/L on POD3 could distinguish CR-POPF from non-clinicalPOPF(the sensitivity and specificity were 75% and85%, respectively). In the high risk group, the best cutoff was a drain amylase level of 1600(the sensitivity and specificity were 77 and 63%, respectively).CONCLUSION: A 6-point scoring system accurately predicted the occurrence of CR-POPF. In addition, a drain amylase level on POD3 might be a predictor of this complication.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2015年第19期5926-5933,共8页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 PANCREATIC FISTULA PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION Risk factor Logistic model Pancreatic fistula Pancreaticoduodenectomy Postoperative complication Risk factor Logistic model
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Jimenez RE, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Rattner DW, Chang Y,Warshaw AL. Outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy with pyloruspreservation or with antrectomy in the treatment of chronicpancreatitis. Ann Surg 2000; 231: 293-300 [PMID: 10714621 DOI:10.1097/00000658-200003000-00001].
  • 2El Nakeeb A, Salah T, Sultan A, El Hemaly M, Askr W,Ezzat H, Hamdy E, Atef E, El Hanafy E, El-Geidie A, AbdelWahab M, Abdallah T. Pancreatic anastomotic leakage afterpancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, clinical predictors, andmanagement (single center experience). World J Surg 2013; 37:1405-1418 [PMID: 23494109 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-1998-5].
  • 3Kawai M, Tani M, Hirono S, Ina S, Miyazawa M, Yamaue H.How do we predict the clinically relevant pancreatic fistula afterpancreaticoduodenectomy---an analysis in 244 consecutivepatients. World J Surg 2009; 33: 2670-2678 [PMID: 19774410DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0220-2].
  • 4Yamamoto Y, Sakamoto Y, Nara S, Esaki M, Shimada K, KosugeT. A preoperative predictive scoring system for postoperativepancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg2011; 35: 2747-2755 [PMID: 21913138 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-011-1253-x].
  • 5Greenblatt DY, Kelly KJ, Rajamanickam V, Wan Y, Hanson T,Rettammel R, Winslow ER, Cho CS, Weber SM. Preoperativefactors predict perioperative morbidity and mortality afterpancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18: 2126-2135[PMID: 21336514 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-1594-6].
  • 6Büchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM, Uhl W, Friess H, Z'graggen K. Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: towardthe end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 2003; 138:1310-1314; discussion 1315 [PMID: 14662530 DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.138.12.1310].
  • 7Muscari F, Suc B, Kirzin S, Hay JM, Fourtanier G, FingerhutA, Sastre B, Chipponi J, Fagniez PL, Radovanovic A. Riskfactors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications afterpancreatoduodenectomy: multivariate analysis in 300 patients.Surgery 2006; 139: 591-598 [PMID: 16701090 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.08.012].
  • 8Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, Chaikof EL, Vollmer CM. Aprospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predictspancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg2013; 216: 1-14 [PMID: 23122535 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.002].
  • 9Ansorge C, Str-mmer L, Andrén-Sandberg -, Lundell L,Herrington MK, Segersv-rd R. Structured intraoperativeassessment of pancreatic gland characteristics in predictingcomplications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2012; 99:1076-1082 [PMID: 22556164 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8784].
  • 10Maggiori L, Sauvanet A, Nagarajan G, Dokmak S, Aussilhou B,Belghiti J. Binding versus conventional pancreaticojejunostomyafter pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched study. JGastrointest Surg 2010; 14: 1395-1400 [PMID: 20577828 DOI:10.1007/s11605-010-1212-0].

同被引文献98

引证文献23

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部