期刊文献+

针刀结合手法分型治疗网球肘与单纯手法治疗的疗效比较 被引量:1

Comparison Curative Effect of Meed-knife Technique Type and Pure Technique Type in Treatment of Radiohumeral Bursitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨针刀结合手法与单纯手法治疗网球肘的不同效果。方法选择2012年1月-2014年1月网球肘患者62例,随机分为两组,针刀组采用2%利多因加强的松龙作痛点封闭,之后用4号针刀剥离并切断肘关节伸指肌总腱起点附着处和半环形部分,切断局部微血管神经束,对照组采用单纯手法治疗,比较两组疗效。结果针刀组优良率85.29%,对照组优良率46.43%,P〈0.05,差异具有统计学意义。针刀组的握力、压痛、肘关节功能等评分优于对照组,P〈0.05,差异具有统计学意义。结论针刀治疗网球肘效果比单纯手术治疗疗效理想。 Objective To study the needle knife combination technique and simple technique different effect for the treatment of tennis elbow.Methods Selected 62 patients with tennis elbow from January 2012 to January 2014, were randomly divided into two groups, the needle knife group because of more than 2%, and prednisolone closed, after stripping with 4 needle knife and cut the elbow and the starting point refers to the total muscle tendon adhesion and half ring parts, to cut off the local microvascular nerve bundle, the control group treated by simple technique, compared two groups of curative effect.Results Needle knife group was 85.29%, the control group was 46.43%, the difference between the two groups have statistical signiifcance. Grip strength and tenderness of needle knife group, the elbow joint function score is better than that of control group, the differences between the two groups have statistical significance.Conclusion Needle knife in the treatment of tennis elbow effect than simple operative curative effect is ideal.
作者 高国友 梁雪
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2015年第29期135-136,共2页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 针刀 手法 网球肘 Needle knife Methods Tennis elbow
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献15

共引文献24

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关主题

;
使用帮助 返回顶部