摘要
目的:比较超脉冲CO2激光与液氮冷冻治疗睑黄瘤的临床疗效。方法:将94例睑黄瘤患者随机分为超脉冲CO2激光组和液氮冷冻治疗组,其中激光组58例,冷冻组36例,3个月后判定疗效并观察比较治疗效果。结果:超脉冲CO2激光组痊愈率为74.14%,不良反应率为6.90%;液氮冷冻治疗组痊愈率为30.56%,不良反应率为44.44%。两组痊愈率与不良反应发生率比较,均有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:超脉冲CO2激光治疗睑黄瘤的临床疗效明显优于液氮冷冻,值得临床推广和应用。
Objective To compare the efficacy of xanthelasma with ultrapulse CO2 laser and liquid nitrogen cryotherapy. Methods 94 cases with xanthelasma were randomly divided into ultrapulse CO2 laser group and liquid nitrogen cryotherapy group,58 cases in laser group and 36 cases in cryotherapy group.The clinical efficacy were oberserved and compared after 3 months. Results In ultrapulse CO2 laser group,the cure rate was 74.14%,and the adverse reaction rate was 6.90%,while in liquid nitrogen cryotherapy group,there was 30.56% and 44.44%.There were significant difference in the cure rate and the adverse reaction rate between two groups(P〈0.05,). Conclusion The utrapulse CO2 laser therapy to treat xanthelasma was better than liquid nitrogen cryotherapy.lt was worthy of promotion in the treatment of xanthelasma.
出处
《中国美容医学》
CAS
2015年第22期46-48,共3页
Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
关键词
超脉冲CO2激光
液氮冷冻
睑黄瘤
疗效
ultrapulse C02 laser
liquid nitrogen cryotherapy
xanthelasma
efficacy